Frankenstein In Children's Visual Culture | Sara Austin
Maybe your like
- Log In
- Sign Up
- more
- About
- Press
- Papers
- Terms
- Privacy
- Copyright
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- less
Info
keyboard_arrow_downkeyboard_arrow_up
Sara AustinSara AustindownloadDownload PDFdescriptionSee full PDFvisibility247
views
format_quote0
citations
Related papers
arrow_back_ios"'It's Alive': Popular Culture Commodification of Frankenstein's Monster"Natalie NeilldownloadDownload free PDFAbstract
Elizabeth Young explains that since Frankenstein is such a visually evocative novel, early staged versions of Shelley’s monster, such as Richard Peake’s Another Piece of Presumption (1824), have dramatically influenced cultural conceptions of the work. Dwight Codr points out that cultural fears are also imposed on the monster, such as Boris Karloff’s polio-like gait. Such changes have degraded Shelley’s eloquent Prometheus into a shambling, mute object of pity. Contrary to how B horror movies or parodies present him, within contemporary children’s culture Shelley’s monster is the eternal optimist. Though little attention has been paid to Shelley’s legacy in children’s literature, I will argue that these adaptations preserve what Young describes as Shelley’s progressive philosophic vision.Works including Frankenstein Makes a Sandwich, Crankenstein, Frankenstein: A BabyLit® Anatomy Primer, Frankenstein: A Monstrous Parody, A Monsters’ Monster and the Monster High webseries show Shelley’s monster as happy and thankful to be alive. By highlighting the childlike qualities of the monster and preserving the monster’s voice, children’s adaptations of Frankenstein restore to the monster's narrative the opportunity for self-love and positive social change.
... Read moreKey takeaways
AI generated
- Children's adaptations of Frankenstein restore the monster's narrative of self-love and social change.
- Cultural adaptations emphasize the monster's childlike qualities, contrasting with traditional horror depictions.
- Children's literature reinterprets Shelley’s monster as an optimistic figure, influencing cultural perceptions.
- The character's evolution reflects a sampling of various texts rather than strict adaptations of the original.
- Monster High's Frankie Stein embodies themes of acceptance and social representation, enhancing children's agency.
FAQ's
AI generated
What are the implications of using Frankenstein's monster in children's literature?addThe research indicates that using Frankenstein's monster in children's literature reflects societal views on childhood and agency, reifying the child's vulnerability while also suggesting autonomy. For instance, works like 'Crankenstein' portray monstrousness as a temporary state of childhood rather than a permanent identity.
How does the visual representation of Frankenstein impact its cultural significance?addThe paper reveals that visual symbols from the 1931 film shape children's perceptions of Frankenstein's monster, influencing adaptations over time. Specific iconographic elements, like neck bolts and scars, serve as immediate cultural references that bypass the original literary text’s depth.
What novel insights do recent children's texts provide about the monster-child relationship?addTexts such as 'Frankie Stein' explore the monster-child dynamic, portraying both as marginalized figures seeking acceptance. In contrast to traditional narratives, these modern iterations emphasize empowerment and agency amid social conflict.
When did the transition from adaptation to literary sampling begin for Frankenstein's monster?addThe transition to literary sampling is traced back to the enduring influence of the 1931 film and subsequent sequels, which emphasize iconic imagery over direct textual adaptation. This shift reflects a broader trend in American culture where the monster becomes a mythic symbol rather than a character bound to Shelley's original narrative.
What methodologies were employed to analyze the children's interpretations of Frankenstein?addThe analysis synthesizes cultural studies and literary criticism, focusing on textual and visual analyses across various children's media. It draws upon Hutcheon's theoretical framework on adaptations to distinguish between direct adaptations and cultural reinterpretations.
closeTitleAbstractKey TakeawaysFAQs1 of 12format_list_bulletedOutlinebookmark_borderSave shareShareDownload research papers for free!
Join us!arrow_forwardRelated papers
Mary Shelley / Transmedia Creatures: Frankenstein’s Afterlives
Chris WashingtondownloadDownload free PDFFrankenstein A Special Issue
Francesca OrestanodownloadDownload free PDFAesthetic Transgressions in Mary Shelley ’ s Frankenstein
Evan DekensdownloadDownload free PDFBeyond Adaptation: Frankenstein's Postmodern Progeny
Pedro Javier PardodownloadDownload free PDFFrankenstein; or, the Modern Protagonist
Anna E. ClarkdownloadDownload free PDF(Re)constructing Frankenstein: the other side of nature
Sara KosmajacdownloadDownload free PDF- Explore
- Papers
- Topics
- Features
- Mentions
- Analytics
- PDF Packages
- Advanced Search
- Search Alerts
- Journals
- Academia.edu Journals
- My submissions
- Reviewer Hub
- Why publish with us
- Testimonials
- Company
- About
- Careers
- Press
- Help Center
- Terms
- Privacy
- Copyright
- Content Policy
Tag » Why Does Frankenstein Have Stitches
-
Frankenstein's Monster - Wikipedia
-
Why Did Frankenstein Have Bolts In His Neck? - Quora
-
Headscratchers / Frankenstein - TV Tropes
-
The Science Behind Frankenstein's Monster, By Dr Kathryn Harkup
-
Identity V Art References On Twitter: "@2ndaverageacco1 The Iconic ...
-
[Frankenstein] Why Did Herr Doktor Need A Separate Brain ... - Reddit
-
Five Things You (probably) Don't Know About 'Frankenstein'
-
Frankenstein In Stitches
-
200 Years Of Stitches: The Origins Of Frankenstein - YouTube
-
Frankenstein Proteins Stitched Together By Scientists
-
Why Does The Bride Of Frankenstein Have Bandages? [Solved] (2022)
-
[Making A Monster] FRANKENSTEIN: How A Legendary Make-Up ...
-
VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN: 3 STARS. “stitches A Monstrous Story ...