- DeviceList
- Smartphones
- CPUs
- Video Cards
- Search
Home / CPU / AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 Video Specifications
- General information
- Benchmarks
- Technologies and extensions
- RAM parameters
- Virtualization technologies
- Graphics specifications
Games
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Tanks
AMD FX-8350 57% DeviceList score vs
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 6% DeviceList score We compared the characteristics of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.AMD FX-8350 benefits
Maximum frequency |
4.2 GGz 1.1 GGz (35.5%) better vs 3.1 GGz |
Price-quality ratio |
96.1 % 89.2 % (1292.8%) better vs 6.9 % |
Maximum core temperature |
61 °C -24 °C (-28.2%) better vs 85 °C |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 benefits Winner in comparison
Number of cores |
12 4 (50%) better vs 8 |
Number of threads |
24 16 (200%) better vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology |
22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better vs 32 nm |
Transistor count |
4700 million 4699 million (469900%) better vs 1 million |
Power Consumption (TDP) |
120 Wt -5 Wt (-4%) better vs 125 Wt |
Passmark |
12901 6965 (117.3%) better vs 5936 |
Video Video reviews AMD FX-8350 AMD FX-8350 vs Intel i7-3770K vs Intel i5-3570K CPU Comparison Review
Comparison of all specifications
AMD FX-8350 | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
General information |
Type |
Десктопный | Серверный |
Architecture codename |
Vishera | Haswell |
Number of coresA large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance. |
8 | 12 4 (50%) better |
Number of threadsMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
8 | 24 16 (200%) better |
Base frequency |
4 GGz | no data |
Maximum frequencyProcessors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
4.2 GGz 1.1 GGz (35.5%) better | 3.1 GGz |
Manufacturing process technology |
32 nm | 22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better |
Crystal size |
315 мм2 | 306.18 мм2 |
Transistor count |
1 million | 4700 million 4699 million (469900%) better |
64 bit support |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
1 | 2 |
Socket |
AM3+ | FCLGA2011-3 |
AMD-V |
Series |
AMD FX-Series (Desktop) | Intel Xeon E5 |
Start price |
no data | 1589 USD |
Price-quality ratioThe sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
96.1 % 89.2 % (1292.8%) better | 6.9 % |
Bus |
no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
Maximum core temperature |
61 °C -24 °C (-28.2%) better | 85 °C |
vPro |
TXTIntel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
PCI Express revision |
n/a | 3.0 |
PCI-Express line count |
no data | 40 |
Demand Based Switching |
no data | + |
PAE |
no data | 46 бит |
Secure Key |
OS Guard |
no data | + |
Flex Memory Access |
no data | - |
FMA |
+ | + |
Vcore Voltage P0 |
Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
L2 Cache |
8192 Кб | 3 Мб |
L3 Cache |
no data | 30 Мб |
Free Multiplier |
Power Consumption (TDP)The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load, the larger the value - the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase. |
125 Wt | 120 Wt -5 Wt (-4%) better |
EDB |
no data | + |
Permissible core voltage |
no data | 0.65V–1.3V |
Benchmarks |
Passmark |
5936 | 12901 6965 (117.3%) better |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
3201 | no data |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
16904 | no data |
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
97 | no data |
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
636 | no data |
WinRAR 4.0 |
4562 | no data |
x264 encoding pass 1 |
139 | no data |
x264 encoding pass 2 |
44 | no data |
TrueCrypt AES |
4 | no data |
3DMark06 CPU |
6648 | no data |
Geekbench 2 |
11198 | no data |
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
7380 | no data |
Technologies and extensions |
Advanced instructions |
no data | Intel® AVX2 |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
Turbo Boost |
no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-ThreadingMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
Idle States |
Thermal Monitoring |
AES-NIMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
+ | + |
AVXThe presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding applications. |
RAM parameters |
Supported memory types |
no data | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133 |
Maximum memory sizeThe maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
no data | 768 Gb |
Max memory channels |
no data | 4 |
EEC memory supportEEC memory is specially designed for systems with high requirements for data processing reliability. This type of memory automatically recognizes errors that occur. Typically used on server computers. |
Virtualization technologies |
VT-dIntel's virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
VT-x |
EPT |
Games
We have selected for you 2 videos with performance tests AMD FX-8350, Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 in games: Cyberpunk 2077, World of Tanks.
Cyberpunk 2077
World of Tanks
vs AMD FX-8300 vs AMD FX-8350
vs AMD Athlon II X4 640 vs AMD FX-8350
vs AMD FX-4350 vs AMD FX-8350
vs AMD FX-8320 vs AMD FX-8350
vs AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8120
vs AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
vs AMD FX-8350 vs AMD A10-5800K
vs Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Core i5-3470 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Core i7-4770 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4
vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Core i7-9700F Popular comparisons
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i7-8569U
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Xeon E-2226G
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i7-8557U
vs Intel Core i3-2350M vs AMD FX-8350
vs Intel Core i5-4590S vs AMD FX-8350
vs AMD A6-3420M vs AMD FX-8350
vs Intel Xeon E5-2403 vs AMD FX-8350
vs Intel Core i3-4010Y vs AMD FX-8350
vs Intel Atom S1260 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Core i7-3612QM vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Xeon E5-4655 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Celeron 1037U vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs Intel Core i3-3250 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- About us
- Contacts
- Privacy policy
- User agreement
- Русский
- English
- Português
- Türk
- Deutsch
- Français
- Italiano
- Español
- Polski