AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Xeon X3440 - CPU UserBenchmarks
Có thể bạn quan tâm
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
CPURANKINGS |
TESTYOUR CPU |
ADD TO PCBUILD |
4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.53 GHz, Lynnfield.Release date ≤ Q1 2014.
X3430 X3440 X3450 X3460 X3470 VS BenchYourCPU ▲ 5726,798 ▼ BUY • $1208 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.Release date: Q4 2012.
8300 8320 8320E 8350 8370 8370E Effective Speed +7% Real World Speed Performance profile from 319,230 user samples Benchmark your CPU here 6,034 User BenchmarksBest Bench: 78% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Poor: 54% Great: 78% SPEED RANK: 518th / 1468Gaming 65% Battle cruiser | Desktop 68% Battle cruiser | Workstation 49% Yacht |
Gaming 61% Destroyer | Desktop 63% Destroyer | Workstation 47% Yacht |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed | 65.2 % | Slightly faster effective speed. | 60.8 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency | 87.5 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. | 81 Pts |
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed | 70.4 Pts | Slightly faster single-core speed. | 64.3 Pts |
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed | 135 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. | 122 Pts |
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed | 237 Pts | Slightly faster quad-core speed. | 221 Pts |
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed | 329 Pts | 341 Pts | +4% |
Memory OC Memory Latency | 95.8 Pts | +4% | 91.8 Pts |
1-Core OC Single Core Speed | 97.6 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed. | 73.3 Pts |
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed | 190 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. | 143 Pts |
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed | 342 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. | 254 Pts |
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed | 470 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. | 397 Pts |
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) | 0 % | 0.04 % | Insanely higher market share. |
User Rating UBM User Rating | 54 % | 57 % | Slightly more popular. |
Age Newest | 128+ Months | More recent. | 146 Months |
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed | 470 Pts | Faster OC 64-core speed. | 411 Pts |
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed | 331 Pts | 353 Pts | Slightly faster 64-core speed. |
Great cheap cpu , payed only 14$ and offers i7 level of performance and overclocks really well , though it's really starting to show it's age [Apr '19 XxAdyxX98]
MORE DETAILS
In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
User Builds 6,034 313,196 Systems with these CPUs Top Builds that include these CPUs Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for moneyCHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2024 CPU RankingsWe calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
Group Test Results
- Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop ProGaming CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USBHow it works
- - Download and run UserBenchmark
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC
- - See speed test results from other users
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Frequently Asked Questions
Processors FAQ AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021 How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake? What is multi core mixed speed? What is multi core integer speed? What is multi core floating point speed? What is single core mixed CPU speed? What is quad core mixed CPU speed? What is quad core floating point speed? What is quad core integer speed? What is single core floating point speed? What is single core integer speed? What is the GeekBench single core score? What is a CPU? What is the effective CPU speed index? What is overclocking? What is thermal design power (TDP)? ALL FAQs »Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit? Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation. Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark? Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money. Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark? We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products. Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews? The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands. Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users? Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users. The BestCPU | GPU | SSD |
---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-13600K $196 | Nvidia RTX 4060 $250 | WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150 |
Intel Core i5-12600K $150 | Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380 | WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75 |
Intel Core i7-14700K $330 | Nvidia RTX 4070 $490 | Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342 |
Feedback
Link Please enter your feedback here Email CancelTừ khóa » Fx Vs Xeon
-
AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 - UserBenchmark
-
Which Is A Batter Choice?! Used FX Vs Used Xeon - Linus Tech Tips
-
AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Xeon X3440 - Technical City
-
Intel Xeon E5-2667 Vs AMD FX-8350 - Technical City
-
AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Vs Intel Xeon X5660 @ 2.80GHz
-
AMD FX-8320 Vs Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3: What Is The Difference?
-
AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3 - DeviceList
-
AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Xeon X5690 - GadgetVersus
-
AMD FX 8350 Vs Intel Xeon W3520 | Full Comparison - Productz
-
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3 Vs AMD FX-8350 - HWBench
-
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3 Vs AMD FX-8350 - Benchmark, Comparison ...
-
AMD FX-8350 Vs Intel Xeon L5410 - CPU-World
-
AMD FX-8350 Compare Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 CPU - Game-Debate
-
FX-8350 Vs Xeon E5-2440 CPU Comparison - HardwareDB