AMD Radeon R9 280X Vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Có thể bạn quan tâm
- Home
- Processors
-
- Compare CPUs
- Rating
- List
-
- Videocards
-
- Compare GPUs
- Rating
- List
-
- Home
- / Videocards
- / Compare videocards
- / AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 280X and AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon R9 280X
vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 38.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 1,229 gflops
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 31 January 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 1,229 gflops |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 280X | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 280X | AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials | ||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tahiti | Tahiti |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 372 | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info | ||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | 1,229 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 4,313 million |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports | ||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 275 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support | ||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 240.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
CompareCompare AMD Radeon R9 280X with others
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
AMDRadeon R9 380
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 280X vs
NVIDIATesla K80 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
- Processors
- Compare
- Rating
- Videocards
- Compare
- Rating
Links
- Terms
- Privacy
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2026, AskGeek.io Từ khóa » Hd 7950 Vs R9 280x
-
AMD HD 7950 Vs R9 280X - GPU UserBenchmarks
-
Radeon HD 7950 Vs Radeon R9 280X Graphics Cards Comparison
-
Radeon HD 7950 Vs R9 280X [in 3 Benchmarks] - Technical City
-
R9 280X Vs HD 7950 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-3770K Vs ...
-
Radeon HD 7950 Vs Radeon R9 280X - HWBench
-
AMD Radeon R9 280X Vs Sapphire Radeon HD 7950
-
Radeon R9 280X Compare Radeon HD 7950 Sapphire 3GB Boost ...
-
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Vs R9 280X Comparison - GPUZoo
-
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Vs AMD Radeon R9 280X - DeviceList
-
Radeon HD 7950 Gets Second Life As Radeon R9 280
-
7950 Vs R9 280x Is It Worth It? - Tom's Hardware Forum
-
R9 270 Vs HD 7950, Which One To Keep - Guru3D Forums
-
HD 7950 BIOS-mod @ R9 280 Vs GTX 770 4Gb Benchmark In 24 ...
-
AMD Announces Radeon R9 280: Radeon HD 7950 W/Boost Returns