GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card Language ⏷ English French
EN ⏷
FR ☰
- Home page
- ⏵ Processor
- ⏵ Comparison
Apple M1 vs Apple A14 Bionic
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple M1 on one side and the Apple A14 Bionic on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.2GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Apple M1 | Apple A14 Bionic |
| Market (main) | Laptop | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8.5-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.5-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Firestorm, Icestorm | Firestorm, Icestorm |
| Family | M series | A series |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | APL1102, T8103 | APL1W01 |
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2020 |
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET N5 | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 33,700,000,000 | 11,800,000,000 |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base frequency | 2.06 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Energy cores | 4x Apple Icestorm @ 2.06 GHz | 4x Apple Icestorm @ 1.8 GHz |
| High performance cores | 4x Apple Firestorm @ 3.2 GHz | 2x Apple Firestorm @ 3.1 GHz |
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-4266 (2133 MHz) | LPDDR4X-4266 |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 66.7 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| TDP | 14 W | 6 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Apple M1 GPU 8-Core | Apple A14 Bionic GPU |
| GPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| GPU execution units | 128 | 64 |
| GPU shading units | 1,024 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1,278 MHz | 975 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,617 GFLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AI accelerator | AI accelerator 16-core | Neural Engine 16-core |
| AI computing operations per seconds | 11 TOPS | 11 TOPS |
| Max display resolution | 6016 x 3384@60Hz (Thunderbolt), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI) | - |
| Video decoding | H.265, HEVC, VP9 | - |
| Video encoding | H.265, HEVC | - |
| Connectivity | 2 Thunderbolt, 2 USB-C, 1 HDMI 2.0 | - |
| (Mac OS X | iOS)Geekbench 4 single core | 5,792 | 6,654 |
| (Mac OS X | iOS)Geekbench 4 multi-core | 23,220 | 16,840 |
| (macOS | iOS)Geekbench 5 single core | 1,744 | 1,452 |
| (macOS | iOS)Geekbench 5 multi-core | 7,657 | 3,853 |
| (macOS | iOS)Geekbench 6 single core | 2,375 | 2,070 |
| (macOS | iOS)Geekbench 6 multi-core | 8,490 | 4,831 |
| (SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance | 203.4 GFLOPS | 226.8 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio | 1,659 pts / W | 2,807 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor Apple M1 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Apple M1 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Apple A14 Bionic is less. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score |
Apple M1 | 1,052,349 |
| Apple A14 Bionic | 562,639 |
The difference is 87%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data. With iOS:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - iOS |
| Apple M1 | 7,537 28,254 |
| Apple A14 Bionic | 6,654 16,840 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 68%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.With iOS:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - iOS |
| Apple M1 | 1,708 7,247 |
| Apple A14 Bionic | 1,452 3,853 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 88%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality. With iOS:
| Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - iOS |
| Apple M1 | 2,280 8,297 |
| Apple A14 Bionic | 2,070 4,831 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 72%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.
Equivalence:
Apple M1 Intel EquivalentApple M1 AMD EquivalentApple A14 Bionic Intel EquivalentApple A14 Bionic AMD Equivalent
See also:
Apple M1 MaxApple M1 Pro 10-CoreApple M1 Pro 8-CoreApple M1 UltraApple M2Apple M2 MaxApple M2 Pro 10-CoreApple M2 Pro 12-CoreApple M2 UltraApple M3Apple M3 Max 14-CoreApple M3 Max 16-CoreApple M3 Pro 11-CoreApple M3 Pro 12-CoreApple M4 10-CoreApple M4 9-CoreApple M4 Max 14-CoreApple M4 Max 16-CoreApple M4 Pro 12-CoreApple M4 Pro 14-Core
Smartphones with the processor Apple A14 Bionic:
Apple iPhone 12Apple iPhone 12 miniApple iPhone 12 ProApple iPhone 12 Pro Max GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad. Information: We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
