AWS EC2 Instance Comparison: T3 Vs T3a Vs T4g

AWS has a lot of different instance types and it can be difficult to decide which instance type would be the best for a particular use-case. In this article, we will compare three popular instance types: T3, T3a and T4g, across various dimensions such as their specs, their performance as well their cost.

Comparing T3, T3a and T4g instance families

T3 Instances

Amazon’s T instance family is optimized for “burstable” workloads. These workloads generally have low CPU utilization and occasional periods for high CPU activity (called bursts). The T3 instance family is a good fit for this type of workload and can be pretty cost-effective.

T3a Instances

T3 and T3a instances are pretty similar to each other, except the processor. The T3 instances ses the Skylake processor whereas the T3a instances use the AMD EPYC 7000 series processors.

T4g Instances

The T4g instances are powered by Arm-based AWS Graviton2 processors and are supposed to deliver better price and performance.

Become An AWS Expert

Receive a weekly newsletter with in-depth articles and tutorials about AWS. No spam ever.

Subscribers get cheatsheets and guides.

Email Address

Performance

We compared the performance between these instance families by running a bunch of tests on the following instances:

• t3.xlarge
• t3a.xlarge
• t4g.xlarge

Instance Type	Number of cores	Memory (GB)
t3.xlarge	4	16
t3a.xlarge	4	16
t4g.xlarge	4	16

Benchmark

We will be using Sysbench to run various tests to measure the CPU, Memory and File IO performance.

CPU

We ran the CPU benchmark using the following command: sysbench cpu --threads=4 run. We will be comparing the total time as well as the total number of events for the benchmark from start to end.

As we can see from the results below, t4g.xlarge performed the best on this benchmark.

t3.xlarge

General statistics: total time: 10.0008s total number of events: 32591

t3a.xlarge

General statistics: total time: 10.0010s total number of events: 26621

t4g.xlarge

General statistics: total time: 10.0004s total number of events: 113588

Memory

We ran the CPU benchmark using the following command: sysbench memory --threads=4 run. We will be comparing the Operations performed for the different instance types.

In this benchmark, t3.xlarge performed the best whereas t4g.xlarge performed the worst.

t3.xlarge

Total operations: 93129278 (9311302.73 per second) 90946.56 MiB transferred (9093.07 MiB/sec)

t3a.xlarge

Total operations: 85354682 (8533783.52 per second) 83354.18 MiB transferred (8333.77 MiB/sec)

t4g.xlarge

Total operations: 61109295 (6110003.56 per second) 59677.05 MiB transferred (5966.80 MiB/sec)

Disk performance

We also ran simple read & write benchmarks to test the performance of the EBS volumes on each of these instance types.

The T3a instances performed the best on the disk performance benchmarks.

t3.xlarge

Write

dd bs=16k count=102400 oflag=direct if=/dev/zero of=test_data 102400+0 records in 102400+0 records out 1677721600 bytes (1.7 GB, 1.6 GiB) copied, 73.5538 s, 22.8 MB/s

Read

dd bs=16K count=102400 iflag=direct if=test_data of=/dev/null 102400+0 records in 102400+0 records out 1677721600 bytes (1.7 GB, 1.6 GiB) copied, 44.5627 s, 37.6 MB/s

t3a.xlarge

Write

write dd bs=16k count=102400 oflag=direct if=/dev/zero of=test_data 102400+0 records in 102400+0 records out 1677721600 bytes (1.7 GB, 1.6 GiB) copied, 66.9927 s, 25.0 MB/s

Read

dd bs=16K count=102400 iflag=direct if=test_data of=/dev/null 102400+0 records in 102400+0 records out 1677721600 bytes (1.7 GB, 1.6 GiB) copied, 39.1757 s, 42.8 MB/s

t4g.xlarge

Write

dd bs=16k count=102400 oflag=direct if=/dev/zero of=test_data 102400+0 records in 102400+0 records out 1677721600 bytes (1.7 GB, 1.6 GiB) copied, 73.5538 s, 22.8 MB/s

Read

dd bs=16K count=102400 iflag=direct if=test_data of=/dev/null 102400+0 records in 102400+0 records out 1677721600 bytes (1.7 GB, 1.6 GiB) copied, 65.7547 s, 25.5 MB/s

Pricing

We compared the prices between these instance families by looking at the price per hour for each instance type.

T4g instances are the cheapest amongst the three instance families whereas the T3 instances are the most expensive.

Price/core for Linux on-demand instances:

Instance Type	Price / hour
t3.xlarge	$0.1664
t3a.xlarge	$0.1504
t4g.xlarge	$0.1344

Conclusion

The new T4g instances provide better CPU performance and they are cheaper than T3 and T3a instances. This should be the go-to instance type in this instance family.