Best Gaming Monitor 2022 [Guide + Reviews] - DisplayNinja
Need a new gaming monitor? Well, you’ve come to the right place!
Here, you’ll find only the best gaming monitor deals currently available as well as all the information you’ll need to make sure you’re getting the perfect monitor for you.
| Type | Monitor | Size | Resolution | Panel | RefreshRate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best 1080p Gaming Monitors | KTC H24F8 | 24” | 1920x1080 | IPS | 190Hz | Check Price |
ViewSonic XG2431 | 24” | 1920x1080 | IPS | 240Hz | Check Price | |
ASUS XG259CMS* | 25” | 1920x1080 | IPS | 310Hz | Check Price | |
Dell AW2523HF | 25” | 1920x1080 | IPS | 360Hz | Check Price | |
BenQ XL2586X+ | 24” | 1920x1080 | TN | 600Hz | Check Price | |
| Best 1440p VA Gaming Monitors | Koorui 27E6QCA | 27" | 2560x1440 | VA | 180Hz | Check Price |
LG 32G600A* | 32" | 2560x1440 | VA | 180Hz | Check Price | |
KTC H32S25E | 32” | 2560x1440 | VA | 240Hz | Check Price | |
KTC H27E22 | 27” | 2560x1440 | VA | 240Hz | Check Price | |
| Best 1440p IPS Gaming Monitors | KTC H27T22 | 27” | 2560x1440 | IPS | 165Hz | Check Price |
Sansui ES-G25F6Q Pro* | 25” | 2560x1440 | IPS | 300Hz | Check Price | |
KTC H27E6 | 27” | 2560x1440 | IPS | 320Hz | Check Price | |
ASUS PG27AQN | 27” | 2560x1440 | IPS | 360Hz | Check Price | |
| Best UltraWide Gaming Monitors | MSI MAG301RF | 30” | 2560x1080 | IPS | 200Hz | Check Price |
KTC H34S18S | 34” | 3440x1440 | VA | 165Hz | Check Price | |
Sceptre E345B-QUN168W | 34” | 3440x1440 | IPS | 144Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MAG401QR | 40” | 3440x1440 | IPS | 155Hz | Check Price | |
Samsung G9 | 49” | 5120x1440 | VA | 240Hz | Check Price | |
Samsung S40FG75 G75F* | 40” | 5120x2160 | VA | 180Hz | Check Price | |
| Best 4K Gaming Monitors | Gigabyte M27UP* | 27” | 3840x2160 | IPS | 160Hz, 1080p 320Hz | Check Price |
Samsung S37FG75 G75F* | 37” | 3840x2160 | VA | 165Hz | Check Price | |
| Best HDR Gaming Monitors | Innocn 25M2S* | 25" | 2560x1440 | IPS | 240Hz | Check Price |
AOC Q27G40XMN | 27" | 2560x1440 | VA | 180Hz | Check Price | |
KTC M27T6* | 27" | 2560x1440 | VA | 180Hz | Check Price | |
KTC M27P6* | 27" | 3840x2160 | IPS | 160Hz, 1080p 320Hz | Check Price | |
Acer XV275U F3* | 27" | 2560x1440 | IPS | 320Hz | Check Price | |
LG OLED42C5* | 42” | 3840x2160 | OLED | 144Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MAG 272QPW QD-OLED X28* | 27” | 2560x1440 | OLED | 280Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MPG 271QRX | 27” | 2560x1440 | OLED | 360Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50* | 27” | 2560x1440 | OLED | 500Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED X24* | 27” | 3840x2160 | OLED | 240Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MPG 321URX | 32" | 3840x2160 | OLED | 240Hz | Check Price | |
ASUS XG32UCWMG* | 32" | 3840x2160 | OLED | 240Hz (1080p 480Hz) | Check Price | |
KTC M32P10* | 32" | 3840x2160 | IPS | 144Hz | Check Price | |
| Best UltraWide HDR Gaming Monitors | Acer X34 X0* | 34" | 3440x1440 | VA | 200Hz | Check Price |
Dell AW3423DWF | 34" | 3440x1440 | OLED | 165Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MPG 341CQPX | 34" | 3440x1440 | OLED | 240Hz | Check Price | |
LG 39GS95QE | 39" | 3440x1440 | OLED | 240Hz | Check Price | |
LG 45GX900A* | 45" | 3440x1440 | OLED | 240Hz | Check Price | |
LG 45GX950A | 45" | 5120x2160 | OLED | 165Hz, 2560x1080 330Hz | Check Price | |
MSI MPG 491CQPX | 49" | 5120x1440 | OLED | 240Hz | Check Price | |
Samsung Neo G95NC | 57" | 7680x2160 | VA | 240Hz | Check Price |
MSI MPG 321URX
- Infinite contrast
- Instantaneous response times
- VRR up to 240Hz
KTC M27T6
- 1152-zone mini LED FALD
- 1800-nit peak brightness
- VRR up to 180Hz
As you can see, there are plenty of gaming monitors to choose from.
We’ve selected the best models for every possible combination of display specifications in order to provide you with a diverse selection.
While we’ve picked the best monitors for each category, be sure to check the ‘Alternatives’ section of each review below.
Depending on region and availability, the alternate display might suit you better. We’ll also mention if there are any upcoming and/or similar displays to keep in mind.
Be sure to read the reviews below to familiarize yourself with what panel type, resolution, refresh rate and other features (such as HDR and VRR) best suit your preference, budget and PC rig or console. Also, feel free to leave us a comment below if you’re on the fence between two or more gaming monitors!
If you want to view our changelogs for this particular buying guide, you can do so at the end of this article.
Table of ContentsShow
Best 1080p Gaming Monitors
The 1920×1080 or 1080p resolution is the least demanding on your CPU and GPU, allowing you to maintain a high frame rate more easily. Whether you need a good budget 1080p gaming monitor or the absolute best one, we’ve got you covered!
KTC H24F8
Best Budget Gaming Monitor
Size: 24” Resolution: 1920×1080 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 190Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate, consistent and vibrant colors; wide viewing angles
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 190Hz
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
- Tilt-only stand
About The Monitor
The KTC H24F8 is our top-recommended 1080p 144Hz+ gaming monitor – here’s why!
Image Quality
Besides not being demanding, another good thing about 1080p resolution is that it looks good on ~24″ sized screens. On the 23.8″ viewable screen of the KTC H24F8, you get a decent pixel density of 92.56 PPI (pixels per inch).
As a result, you get a decent amount of screen space and fairly sharp details and text. The same resolution on a 27″ monitor, for instance, would look considerably more pixelated, though some users wouldn’t mind it.
The KTC H24F8 is based on an IPS panel that boasts ~90% DCI-P3 gamut for accurate and rich colors and 178° wide viewing angles which ensure that the image remains perfect regardless of the angle you’re looking at it.
Next, it has a peak brightness of 400-nits, meaning that it can get more than bright enough even in bright rooms.
The contrast ratio amounts to 1,000:1, which is standard for IPS panel monitors. So, blacks won’t be quite as deep as that of VA panels (with a ~3,000:1 contrast ratio). It’s mainly in dark rooms that blacks appear a bit grayish in comparison to VA panels, but the image is still quite vibrant overall. Besides, VA panels have flaws of their own.
IPS monitors are also affected by IPS glow, but its severity varies across different units of monitors, and it’s usually manageable.
Features

The KTC H24F8 has a fast GtG pixel response time speed for no visible trailing behind fast-moving objects – ideal for first-person shooters.
AMD FreeSync is supported with a 48-190Hz VRR range for tear-free gameplay up to 190FPS, and the ‘G-SYNC Compatible’ mode works flawlessly with GeForce cards, even though the monitor is not certified by NVIDIA.
In contrast, VA panel monitors at this price range have significantly slower response time speed, resulting in noticeable smearing in fast-paced games. Moreover, most units are affected by VRR brightness flickering.
Other features include various picture presets, Black Equalize (improves visibility in darker scenes), crosshair overlays, on-screen timers, a refresh rate tracker, etc.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is tilt-only, but the screen is VESA mount compatible, so we highly recommend investing in a third-party stand. A basic ~$20 desk-clamping stand will provide you with more ergonomics than any stand, declutter your desk and you can use it in the future for other monitors.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, two HDMI 2.0 ports and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
In case the KTC H24F8 is not on sale, the Sansui ES-G24F4 also sometimes gets discounted to $99.
Other good options for ~$110, include the MSI G244F E2 and the KTC H25T7.
ViewSonic XG2431
Best MBR Gaming Monitor
Size: 23.8” Resolution: 1920×1080 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- Wide viewing angles
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync up to 240Hz
- Best MBR implementation
- Fully ergonomic stand
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
About The Monitor
If you want CRT-like motion clarity, we highly recommend the ViewSonic XG2431 due to its impeccable MBR implementation with Blur Busters Approved 2.0 certification.
Image Quality
The ViewSonic XG2431 offers similar image quality to that of the KTC H24F8, but you get a higher 240Hz refresh rate for smoother gameplay.
You get a 350-nit peak brightness, a 1,000:1 contrast ratio, 8-bit color depth support with full sRGB gamut coverage, 178° wide viewing angles and a quick 1ms GtG pixel response time speed.
The monitor supports AMD FreeSync with a 48-240Hz VRR range and VRR works without issues with NVIDIA cards.
What makes the ViewSonic XG2431 exceptional is its PureXP+ backlight strobing technology that offers amazing performance with basically no strobe crosstalk or other visual artifacts. It also offers plenty of well-optimized presets for strobing at different refresh rates and brightness levels, as well as advanced customization.
Check out our ViewSonic XG2431 review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand is robust and offers a good range of ergonomics, including up to 120mm height adjustment, -5°/15° tilt, 90° pivot, +/- 90° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.0 ports, DisplayPort 1.4, a headphone jack, two 3W built-in speakers and a dual-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
If the ViewSonic XG2431 is not available, check out the Acer XV252QZ as a budget 1080p 240Hz alternative. The ASUS XG249CM can also sometimes be found on sale for $200.
Dell AW2523HF
Best 360Hz IPS Gaming Monitor
Size: 25” Resolution: 1920×1080 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 360Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- Wide viewing angles
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 360Hz
- Fully ergonomic stand
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
About The Monitor
Want an even higher refresh rate? Check out the Dell AW2523HF!
Image Quality
Now, as you might’ve expected, the jump to 360Hz from 240Hz won’t be as noticeable as the jump to 240Hz from 144Hz, but the difference between 144Hz and 360Hz is big!
So, if you already have a 240Hz display, the Dell AW2523HF won’t exactly provide you with a significantly smoother experience.
What’s the bottom line? The difference between 240Hz and 360Hz is there, and experienced players will certainly notice and feel it.
So, if you’re one of those competitive gamers where every millisecond counts, you will want 360Hz — granted that your PC can output as many FPS.
As for the image quality, the monitor is based on a 24.5″ IPS panel with 400-nit peak brightness, a 1,000:1 contrast ratio and ~99% sRGB color gamut, so you’re getting the same viewing experience as with the previously mentioned XG2431 240Hz IPS model.
The Dell AW2523HF supports AMD FreeSync for tear-free gameplay up to 360FPS.
Basically, with the Dell AW2523HF, you get power input lag, while the XG2431 offers better motion clarity.
Other features include custom crosshairs and timers, various pre-calibrated picture presets, crosshair overlays and Dark Stabilizer for better visibility in dark scenes of games.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 110mm, -5°/21° tilt, +/- 20° swivel, 90° pivot and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, two HDMI 2.0 ports (max 240Hz), a headphone jack, an audio line-out port and a quad-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
We usually recommend the Acer XV252QF with a 390Hz overclockable refresh rate, MBR support and better response time overdrive, but it seems to be discontinued.
BenQ XL2586X+
Best eSports Gaming Monitor
Size: 24.1” Resolution: 1920×1080 Panel: TN Refresh Rate: 600Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Wide color gamut
- Plenty of features, including VRR and MBR up to 600Hz
- Quick response time, low input lag
- Ergonomic stand
The Cons:
- Narrow viewing angles
About The Monitor
The BenQ Zowie XL2586X+ offers an even higher 600Hz refresh rate!
Image Quality
The XL2586X+ doesn’t have a G-SYNC module, but relies on Adaptive-Sync for VRR performance. This also means that ULMB2 isn’t availabe, but BenQ have their own backlights strobing implementation called DyAc 2 (Dynamic Accuracy), which delivers excellent performance as well
Moreover, unlike ULMB2, DyAc 2 has a wider operating range, from 600Hz all the way down to 100Hz. It also has minimum strobe crosstalk and brightness penalty.
Zowie also offers additional exclusive features, such as XL Settings To Share (allows you to import picture settings from other players) and highly customizable Black eQualizer and Color Vibrance settings.
Design & Connectivity

The stand offers height adjustment up to 155mm, -5°/35° tilt, +/- 45° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
It also comes with the shading flaps to minimize distractions.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, three HDMI 2.1 ports and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- ASUS XG248QSG – 610Hz model for the same price
- BenQ XL2586X – older model with a 540Hz refresh rate, can be found for ~$50 less
- Acer XV240 F6, MSI MPG 242R X60N – other 600Hz models announced for 2025
- Koorui G7 – a 25″ 1080p 750Hz TN model teased at CES 2025
Best 1440p VA Gaming Monitors
For most people, 1440p resolution and at least a 144Hz refresh rate is the perfect combination. You get a crisp and sharp image quality as well as a responsive gaming experience since 1440p is not nearly as taxing on your GPU as 4K UHD.
Koorui 27E6QCA
Affordable 1440p 144Hz Curved Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 180Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio
- High pixel density
- Wide color gamut
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 144Hz
The Cons:
- Ghosting in fast-paced games, mainly in darker scenes
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
- Tilt-only stand
About The Monitor
The Koorui 27E6QCA is one of the most affordable 1440p 180Hz gaming monitors. It uses a curved VA panel for a more immersive gaming experience, but a weaker performance when it comes to fast-paced gaming.
Image Quality
The Koorui 27E6QCA provides you with a high contrast ratio (3,000:1) and a wide ~85% DCI-P3 color gamut, which along with the curved screen, greatly improves the visual aspect of the gaming experience.
However, the monitors have a slower response time speed, resulting in more noticeable ghosting and trailing in fast-paced games, mainly in darker scenes.
All in all, if you aren’t all that into competitive gaming and would rather get better visuals, the Koorui 27E6QCA is for you.
Don’t worry, you’ll still be able to enjoy single-player and casual multiplayer first-person shooters – unless you’re particularly sensitive to ghosting.
Moving on, AMD FreeSync is supported with a 48-180Hz VRR range and it works with compatible NVIDIA cards. Alas, some units suffer from the FreeSync brightness flickering issue.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is tilt-only, but the screen is VESA mount compatible via the 75x75mm pattern. The screen has a moderate 1500R curvature for added immersion.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.0 ports, DisplayPort 1.4 and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- Koorui 27E1QA – flat-screen version of this monitor
- Gigabyte GS27QC – a bit more expensive model without wide color gamut, but with slightly faster response times
Gigabyte M32QC
Affordable 1440p 144Hz Curved Gaming Monitor
Size: 32” Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 170Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio
- Wide color gamut
- Plenty of features, including VRR + MBR up to 170Hz
- Height-adjustable stand, USB hub, KVM
The Cons:
- Ghosting in fast-paced games, mainly in darker scenes
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
About The Monitor
If you want a larger 32″ sized 1440p high refresh rate VA screen, we recommend the Gigabyte M32QC.
Image Quality
The 1440p resolution still looks decent on 32″ sized displays. You get a pixel density of 93 PPI, which is similar to that of 24″ 1080p monitors.
However, since the screen is larger, you’ll be sitting further away from it, so individual pixels won’t be that noticeable at a normal viewing distance.
Next, the M32QC has a wide 94% DCI-P3 color gamut, a decent 350-nit peak brightness (400-nits for HDR) and a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio.
VRR is supported up to 170Hz for tear-free gameplay, and you can use backlight strobing at the same time via Gigabyte’s Aim Stabilizer Sync.
Some units are susceptible to VRR brightness flickering, mainly in in-game menus, loading screens and games with fluctuating frame rates.

You’ll also find plenty of useful features, including Black Equalizer, Color Vibrance, crosshair overlays, PiP/PbP, on-screen timers and more!
Check out our detailed M32QC review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 100mm, tilt by -5°/20° and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility. The screen has a steep 1500R curvature for added immersion.
Connectivity options include DP 1.2, two HDMI 2.0 ports, a USB-C port with DP Alt Mode and 18W PD, a dual-USB 3.0 hub and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- LG 32GN650 – 32″ 1440p 144Hz gaming monitor with a flat-screen VA panel but no wide color gamut support
- LG 32G600A – 32″ 1440p 180Hz gaming monitor with a steeper 1000R curvature
In case the M32QC is not available, check out the older G32QCA model (no KVM switch) or the newer GS32QC (tilt-only stand, no KVM, no wide color gamut). Other alternatives worth considering include the Koorui GA01 (wide color gamut) and the Acer EI322QURP (sRGB gamut only).
KTC H32S25E
Best 1440p 240Hz Curved Gaming Monitor
Sizes: 32″ Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio
- Wide color gamut
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
The Cons:
- Minor ghosting in fast-paced games, mainly in darker scenes
- 1000R curvature too steep for some users
- Tilt-only stand
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
About The Monitor
For only ~$30 extra, you can get the KTC H32S25E with a higher 240Hz refresh rate!
Image Quality
The H32S25E has a maximum refresh rate of 240Hz, which provides you with a subtle but noticeable jump in motion clarity as opposed to 170Hz of the M32QC. It also has a bit faster pixel response time speed for less ghosting.
However, KTC’s model has a steeper 1000R screen curvature, which might not appeal to some users.
Other specifications are similar, including a 4000:1 contrast ratio, a 350-nit peak brightness and a wide 90% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage.
Check out our in-depth KTC H32S25E review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The design of the monitor includes a steep 1000R curvature which matches the curvature of the human eye for added immersion, though some people might find that the curvature is too aggressive.
The stand is tilt-only, but the screen is VESA mount compatible via the 100x100mm pattern.
Connectivity options include two DisplayPort 1.4 ports, two HDMI 2.0 ports (max 144Hz at 1440p), a headphone jack and a USB hub for service and firmware updates.
Alternatives
Samsung offers a similar gaming monitor, the Odyssey G6, with DisplayHDR 600 and built-in Tizen smartOS, however, it’s a lot more expensive, while the HDR image quality is underwhelming since it lacks FALD.
KTC H27E22
Best Value 27″ 1440p 240Hz VA Gaming Monitor
Sizes: 27″ Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio and pixel density
- Wide color gamut
- Plenty of features including VRR up to 240Hz
- Fully ergonomic stand, USB hub
The Cons:
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
About The Monitor
If you’d rather have a fast 1440p 240Hz flat-screen VA gaming monitor, the KTC H27E22 might be for you! Sadly, there are no 32″ flat-screen VA monitors available with fast pixel response time speed.
Image Quality
The KTC H27E22 is one of the rare 27″ 1440p 240Hz gaming monitors with a high 3,000:1 contrast ratio and a rapid GtG pixel response time speed, providing you with both deep blacks and smooth motion clarity in a popular 27″ 16:9 flat-screen format.
On top of that, it has a wide 90% DCI-P3 gamut coverage for vibrant colors, a decent 400-nit peak brightness and an affordable price!
The only downside is, as expected for a high refresh rate VA monitor, VRR brightness flickering in in-game menus, loading screens and games with fluctuating frame rates.
However, given that this isn’t noticeable in all games, and that in affected games you can just disable VRR (since tearing isn’t that noticeable at 240Hz), we feel that a lot of gamers won’t mind it.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers full ergonomic support with up to 130mm height adjustment, +/- 90° pivot, +/- 45° swivel, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, two HDMI 2.0 ports, a USB-C port with DP Alt Mode, three downstream USB-A ports and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- KTC H27E22S – the same monitor but without an ergonomic stand or as extensive connectivity options for a lower price.
Best 1440p IPS Gaming Monitors
If you don’t want to deal with gamma/saturation shifts, slow repsonse time and VRR brightness flickering of VA panels, check out the best 1440p IPS models – though keep in mind that you’ll have to sacrifice contrast ratio and tolerate IPS glow.
KTC H27T22
Best Budget 1440p 165Hz IPS Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 165Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Wide color gamut
- High pixel density
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync and MBR up to 165Hz
- Eregonomic stand
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
About The Monitor
The KTC H27T22 is one of the cheapest 1440p 165Hz IPS gaming monitors with a 1ms GtG response time speed, allowing you to enjoy fast-paced games with zero ghosting and no VRR brightness flickering.
Image Quality
Thanks to its IPS panel with a wide ~95% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage, the KTC H27T22 delivers consistent and rich colors.
Other panel-related specifications include a 350-nit peak brightness and a 1,000:1 static contrast ratio.
Features
The monitor has both AMD FreeSync Premium and stable G-SYNC Compatible performance for tear-free gameplay up to 180FPS. It also supports backlight strobing.
Other features include Black Equalize (improves visibility in dark scenes), crosshair overlays and various picture presets.
Visit our KTC H27T22 review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers height adjustment up to 135mm, tilt by -5°/23°, +/- 45° swivel, +/- 90° pivot and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include two DisplayPort 1.4 inputs, two HDMI 2.0 ports (max 144Hz), a headphone jack and a USB port for firmware updates.
Alternatives
There are plenty of excellent 27″ 1440p high refresh rate IPS gaming monitors available nowadays ranging from $150 to $200 (depending on sale).
So, we recommend checking them all out and choosing whichever is the cheapest or according to your design/feature preference:
- ASUS VG27AQ3A
- Dell G2724D / Dell G2725D
- KTC H27T22S
- Acer XV271U M3
Titan Army P2510S
Best 24″ 1440p Gaming Monitor
Size: 24.5″ Resolution: 1920×1080 Panel: IPS
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- Wide color gamut
- High pixel density
- Quick response time
- Height-adjustable stand
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync up to 240Hz
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
- Design lacks swivel option
About The Monitor
Update: If you’re looking for a 24″ 1440p display, we now recommend the Innocn 25M2S with HDR support or the Sansui ES-G25F6Q Pro with 300Hz.
Looking for an affordable 1440p 240Hz IPS gaming monitor? The Titan Army P2510S might be for you!
Image Quality
A lot of FPS players prefer ~24″ sized screens for gaming, which is why the Titan Army P2510S is perfect for them!
You get a high 1440p resolution for crisp details, a high 240Hz refresh rate for smooth motion clarity and a rapid 1ms pixel response time speed for no ghosting!
Additionally, the monitor boasts a wide 95% DCI-P3 color gamut and offers the usual gaming features, such as VRR, Game Shadow Enhancement, crosshair overlays, on-screen timers and more!
Check out our full Titan Army P2510S review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is tilt-only, but the screen is VESA mount compatible via the 100x100mm pattern.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.0 ports, two DisplayPort 1.4 inputs and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
In case it’s not available, you’ll have to settle with a model with a lower 165Hz refresh rate and no wide color gamut, the Koorui GP01.
There are two more 24″ 1440p 165Hz IPS models, the AOC Q24G2A and the Philips 24M1N5500Z, but these aren’t available in the US.
KTC H27E6
27″ 1440p 320Hz IPS Gaming Monitor
Sizes: 27″ Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 320Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- Wide color gamut
- High pixel density
- Fully ergonomic stand
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync and VRR up to 320Hz
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
Use code 10DH27E6 for 10% off.
About The Monitor
Would you rather have a flat-screen 27″ 1440p 240Hz IPS gaming monitor?
Check out the KTC H27E6 with a wide color gamut and smooth VRR performance.
Image Quality
The KTC H27E6 uses an IPS panel with 178° wide viewing angles and consistent colors. It has a wide 98% DCI-P3 color gamut and comes with a ~100% sRGB emulation mode.
Now, the KTC H27E6 monitor has a lower contrast ratio than the G6, so you won’t get as deep blacks, but the colors are more vivid and rich.
The HDR picture is also a step down due to the lower 450-nit peak brightness and lack of local dimming.
So, the main advantage of the KTC H27E6 over the G6 is the more vibrant and precise color reproduction, wider viewing angles, impeccable VRR performance, and the fact that most people prefer flat displays at this screen size.
Features
The monitor supports VRR up to 320FPS for tear-free gameplay. FreeSync works with NVIDIA cards without any issues.
Other gaming features include Black Equalize, a refresh rate tracker, crosshair overlays, various picture presets and the MPRT backlight strobing technology.
Check out our KTC H27E6 review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers full ergonomic support with up to 130mm height adjustment, +/- 90° pivot, -5°/20° tilt, +/- 45° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include two DisplayPort 1.4 inputs, two HDMI 2.1 ports, a USB port for firmware updates and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
In case the KTC H27E6 is not available, there are sevearl 1440p 240Hz IPS options available, though they don’t offer as good value for the money.
- Gigabyte M27Q-X – another 1440p 240Hz model with built-in KVM
- MSI G274QPX – same panel with USB-C (65W Power Deliver)
- LG 27GR83Q – no special features
- Titan Army P2710S – no special features
- Gigabyte GS27Q-X – cheapest model but it has a tilt-only stand and not as wide color gamut. It does support MBR though
- ASUS VG27AQML1A – MBR
There are a few 1440p 300Hz models available too, such as the ASUS XG27AQMR and the Acer XV272UKF, but we find that the extra 60Hz and the still underwhelming HDR-600 support are not worth adouble the price of the KTC H27E6.
ASUS PG27AQN
1440p 360Hz Gaming Monitor
Sizes: 27″ Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 360Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- ULMB 2
- High pixel density, wide color gamut, consistent colors, sRGB mode
- Quick response time, low input lag
- Plenty of gaming features including G-SYNC up to 360Hz
- Fully ergonomic stand, USB hub
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
About The Monitor
Nowadays, you can even find a 1440p 360Hz gaming display, but keep in mind that you’ll need quite a powerful PC rig to fully utilize this beast!
Image Quality
The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN is based on an IPS panel with a rapid pixel response time speed. It’s noticeably faster than the Dell AW2523HF 1080p 360Hz IPS model, and basically as fast as BenQ’s XL2566K 360Hz TN display.
On top of that, it has a native G-SYNC module with ULMB 2 support for flawless VRR and backlight strobing (though not at the same time) performance up to 360FPS.
You get a 98% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage for rich and saturated colors, which can sometimes help you distinguish an enemy more quickly in certain scenarios!
The monitor also supports DisplayHDR 600 with a 600-nit peak brightness and 32-zone edge-lit local dimming for a semi-HDR viewing experience.
Overall, you get a single monitor that’s exceptional for competitive games, but also provides you with great image quality for everyday use and even content creation.
Other features include Dark Boost, 25″ Mode, crosshair overlays, picture presets and NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer.
Check out our full ASUS PG27AQN review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand is well-built and offers height adjustment up to 100mm, 90° pivot, +/- 25° swivel, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, three HDMI 2.0 ports (max 144Hz), a headphone jack and a dual-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
- Acer Predator XB273UF – based on the same panel with similar features
If you are interested in these 27″ 1440p 360Hz IPS displays, you may want to wait for the updated model that will feature G-SYNC Pulsar (VRR + MBR performance), although we don’t know the exact release date or pricing yet.
Best UltraWide Gaming Monitors
Ultrawide monitors provide you with a wider field of view which greatly increases both productivity and gaming immersion.
Make sure your favorite games support the 21:9 aspect ratio format though. Otherwise, you’ll have to play with black borders (pillarbox) or with a stretched-out picture.
Note that we have a dedicated buying guide for the best ultrawide monitors.
MSI MAG301RF
Best 1080p UltraWide Gaming Monitor
Size: 29.5” Resolution: 2560×1080 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 200Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync and MBR up to 200Hz
- UltraWide aspect ratio for added immersion
- Ergonomic stand, USB hub
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
About The Monitor
The MSI MAG301RF is one of the most affordable ultrawide gaming monitors yet it’s equipped with a high 200Hz refresh rate and a rapid 1ms GtG response time speed!
Image Quality
This 30″ (29.5″ viewable) ultrawide monitor is essentially as tall as a regular 24″ monitor, just ~33% wider. The pixel density is also similar at 94 PPI.
Most competitive FPS gamers prefer ~24″ sized screens as it allows them to view all the action at once – without having to move their eyes/head as much as they would on a larger monitor.
The MSI MAG301RF basically just extends that 24″ screen horizontally for a wider field of view, allowing you to spot the enemies coming from the left or right corners more quickly. Indeed, it’s a competitive edge, which is why some titles don’t support the 21:9 aspect ratio, such as Overwatch, StarCraft, and Valorant. Most games support it though.
On top of that, you get the 2560×1080 resolution which looks great on a 30″ display but is not very demanding, allowing you to maintain a high frame rate and take advantage of the monitor’s 200Hz refresh rate while the 1ms GtG response time speed efficiently removes ghosting behind fast-moving objects.
It has a peak brightness of 300-nits, a static contrast ratio of 1,000:1, and slightly saturated colors with 105% sRGB gamut.
Features
Moving on, the MSI MAG301RF supports AMD FreeSync up to 200Hz and it’s certified as G-SYNC Compatible by NVIDIA.
Other features include Night Vision (improves visibility in dark scenes of games), Mystic Light RGB LED at the rear of the monitor, various picture presets, MPRT backlight strobing, a refresh rate tracker, on-screen timers, and crosshair overlays.
Design & Connectivity

You can elevate the screen of the monitor up to 130mm, tilt it by -5°/20°, swivel by +/- 45°, or VESA mount it via the 100x100mm pattern.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.2, two HDMI 2.0 ports, a headphone jack and a dual-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
- Sceptre C305B-200UN – A 30″ 2560×1080 200Hz ultrawide gaming monitor based on a curved VA panel. It has a higher contrast ratio, but a much slower response time speed.
KTC H34S18S
3440×1440 & 165Hz Under $300!
Size: 34” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 165Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio and pixel density
- Wide color gamut
- UltraWide format for added immersion
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync and MBR up to 165Hz
- Ergonomic stand
The Cons:
- Ghosting in fast-paced games, mainly in darker scenes
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
About the Monitor
The KTC H34S18S is the best ultrawide gaming monitor under $300.
In fact, the KTC H34S18S is actually cheaper than any 3440×1440 60Hz-75Hz ultrawide IPS model, yet it offers a more immersive picture quality and a more responsive gaming experience, just not as consistent colors or as fast response time.
Image Quality
Based on a VA panel with a 4,000:1 contrast ratio, a 350-nit peak brightness, 10-bit color depth with ~130% sRGB color gamut and 3440×1440 resolution, the monitor delivers a crystal-clear picture quality with deep blacks and vibrant colors.
As if that’s not enough, you hit the pixel density sweet spot of roughly 110 PPI, which results in plenty of screen space available and maximum detail clarity without any scaling necessary.

The main downside of this monitor, as it’s the case with most VA models, is the response time speed. In fast-paced games, there’s noticeable trailing of fast-moving objects, which gets more apparent in darker scenes. To most gamers, it won’t be game-breaking, but if you’re sensitive to ghosting, you’ll prefer an IPS ultrawide monitor.
Features
The KTC H34S18S supports AMD FreeSync with a 48-165Hz VRR range.
However, many units of the monitor have brightness flickering issues when VRR is enabled. Other units, on the other hand, work without any issues, so your mileage may vary.
If you do get a monitor with flickering issues, there are a few ways to reduce it. For instance, you can decrease the VRR range using CRU.
Even if you get a unit that flickers, it won’t necessarily flicker in all video games. So, you can just disable VRR or use MBR (MPRT) in games where flickering occurs.
Other features of the monitor include the standard game-enhancing tools such as Black Equalize, various picture presets and crosshair overlays.
Check out our detailed KTC H34S18S review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers a good range of ergonomics, including up to 90mm height adjustment, +/- 20° swivel, +/- 5° pivot, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility. The screen has a moderate 1500R curvature for added immersion.
Connectivity options include 2x HDMI 2.0 ports, 2x DisplayPort 1.4 ports, a headphone jack and a USB port for service/firmware updates.
Alternatives
You can also find similar 34″ 3440×1440 high refresh rate curved VA models without wide color gamut at a lower price ($250 – $300):
- Aopen 34HC5CURP
- Sceptre C345B-QUT168
- LG 34GP63A
- LG 34WP60C – tilt-only version of the 34GP63A
There are a few good alternatives with a wide color gamut available as well:
- MSI MAG342CQR
- Dell S3422DWG
- HP Omen 34c
- Gigabyte G34WQC-A
All three of the above-mentioned ultrawide monitors use the same panel, so the image quality and performance will be basically identical, including the risk of getting a unit with FreeSync brightness flickering.
Therefore, you can simply choose according to your preference of the design/features or go for whichever is available/cheaper. Not sure which one to pick? Leave us a comment below!
Sceptre E345B-QUN168W
Affordable 3440×1440 144Hz UltraWide Gaming Monitor
Size: 34” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 144Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- UltraWide format for added immersion, wide color gamut
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 144Hz
- Ergonomic stand, USB hub
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
- Screen is flat, not curved
About The Monitor
If you’d like a cheaper 34″ 3440×1440 144Hz IPS ultrawide gaming monitor, we recommend the Sceptre E345B-QUN168W.
Image Quality
The main downside of the Sceptre E345B-QUN168W in comparison to the LG 34GN850 is that it has a flat screen, but it’s also up to ~$200 cheaper.
While most users prefer curved screens at this form factor due to the width of the display, a flat 34″ screen still offers immersive image quality, you’ll just have to sit a fit further from the screen for the optimal viewing experience.
The Sceptre E345B-QUN168W has a wide 95% DCI-P3 color gamut, a strong 400-nit peak brightness, a 1,000:1 contrast ratio and wide 178° viewing angles.
Features
AMD FreeSync is supported with a 48-144Hz range for tear-free gameplay, and it works without issues with compatible NVIDIA graphics cards.
All in all, if you want a 34″ 3440×1440 144Hz ultrawide gaming monitor below $300, but don’t want to deal with dark-level smearing or VRR brightness flickering associated with VA panels, the Sceptre E345B-QUN168W is for you.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 100mm, tilt by -5°/15°, +/- 15° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, three HDMI 2.0 inputs (limited to 100Hz), USB-C (with DP Alt Mode, also limited to 100Hz), a headphone jack, dual 3W integrated speakers and a USB 3.0 hub (3 downstream + 1 upstream).
Alternatives
- Gigabyte M34WQ – based on the same panel, but also has a built-in KVM switch for ~$130 more
MSI MAG401QR
40″ 3440×1440 155Hz UltraWide Gaming Monitor
Size: 40” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 155Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Accurate and consistent colors
- UltraWide format for added immersion, wide color gamut
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 155Hz
- Rich connectivity options, including USB-C with 65W PD and KVM
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
- Screen is flat, not curved
- Tilt-only stand
About The Monitor
You can even find larger 40″ sized flat-screen ultrawide displays for around $400, and the MSI MAG401QR is the best yet also most affordable such model.
Image Quality
The MSI MAG401QR has a screen resolution of 3440×1440, so you get a pixel density of 93 PPI. You can basically think of this monitor as a 32″ 2560×1440 display that’s around 33% wider.
It also has a wide 94% DCI-P3 gamut coverage for vibrant colors, a strong 400-nit peak brightness and a standard 1,000:1 contrast ratio.
Other features include VRR up to 155Hz, crosshair overlays, Night Vision, on-screen timers, PiP/PbP and backlight strobing.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is tilt-only, but the screen is VESA mount compatible via the 100x100mm pattern.
Connectivity options include DP 1.4, two HDMI 2.0 ports, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 65W PD, a dual-USB 3.0 hub, a headphone jack and integrated KVM functionality.
Alternatives
The MSI MAG401QR is the most affordable 40″ 3440×1440 display, but in case it’s not available, consider the Innocn 40C1R and the Aopen 40XV1CUP as alternatives based on the same panel.
Samsung Odyssey G9
Best Super-UltraWide Gaming Monitor
Size: 49” Resolution: 5120×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio, wide color gamut
- High pixel density
- DisplayHDR 1000
- Quick response time
- Plenty of features, including FreeSync up to 240Hz
- Ergonomic stand, USB hub
The Cons:
- Only 10 dimming zones
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
About The Monitor
Interested in something a bit different? The Samsung G9 is a 49″ 32:9 5120×1440 ‘super’ ultrawide gaming monitor!
Essentially, it’s equivalent to two 27″ 1440p monitors put side by side, just without the gap in between — but the Samsung S49CG95 (G95C) has more tricks up its sleeve!
Image Quality
The Samsung Odyssey G9 has a VA panel that boasts a superior contrast ratio of 2,500:1. It also uses quantum dot technology (QLED) to further increase its color gamut to 125% sRGB (95% DCI-P3).
It also has a high 1,000-nit peak brightness with VESA’s DisplayHDR 1000 certification, however, since it only has 10 dimming zones, you won’t be getting a true HDR viewing experience.
Regardless, the Samsung S49CG95 offers an incredibly immersive picture quality thanks to its excellent contrast, brightness and color gamut performance, while 1ms GtG response time and the 240Hz refresh rate ensure a smooth and fluid performance.
Features
VRR is supported up to 240Hz for tear-free gameplay, though there’s the standard VRR brightness flickering issue associated with VA and OLED panels.
Other gaming features include Virtual Aim Point, pre-calibrated picture modes (FPS, RTS, RPG, and AOS) and Black Equalizer (improves visibility in darker games).
For more information, visit our Samsung Odyssey G9 review.
Design & Connectivity

The design of the monitor includes a steep 1000R curvature for added immersion and RGB lighting at the back of the monitor.
You can elevate the screen up to 120mm, tilt it by -5°/15°, swivel by +/- 15°, or VESA mount it (100x100mm).
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, two HDMI 2.1 ports, a headphone jack and a dual-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
The Odyssey G9 goes for ~$800 – $1,300. There’s also the older Odyssey C49G95T model with a lighter design that goes for the same price. So, pick whichever is cheaper. LG also offers a model based on the same panel, the LG 49GR85DC, but it doesn’t have as good overdrive implementation due to minor black smearing.
Alternatives to the original G9 (and the darker G95C) include:
- ASUS XG49WCR – a lower 165Hz refresh rate and slower response time. It has a USB-C port with 90W PD, KVM and a $800 price.
- LG 45GR65DC / LG 45GR75DC – a smaller 45″ 5120×1440 200Hz super-ultrawide monitor. It doesn’t have as fast response time though. The 45GR65DC variant is worth considering on sale for $550. The 45GR75DC model features a USB-C port with 90W PD and built-in KVM.
- LG 49WQ95C – a 49″ 5120×1440 144Hz model with an IPS panel, providing you with more vibrant and accurate colors, wider viewing angles and USB-C 90W PD + KVM, but it has IPS glow and lower contrast ratio
Best 4K Gaming Monitors
In this category, you’ll find the best 4K monitors for both PC and console gaming. Keep in mind that in order to run PC games at 4K UHD with decent frame rates and picture settings, you will need a powerful CPU and GPU.
MSI MAG274UPF E2
Best Value 4K 160Hz Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 160Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High pixel density, 4K UHD
- Accurate and vibrant colors
- Plenty of features including FreeSync + MBR up to 160Hz
- Fully ergonomic stand
The Cons:
- IPS glow and mediocre contrast ratio (as expected from this panel technology)
About The Monitor
Update: We now recommend the Gigabyte M27UP instead. It has a 1080p 320Hz Dual Mode and goes fora lower $330 – $380 price. If you don’t need Dual Mode, the Gigabyte GS27U can be found for $300.
The MSI MAG274UPF E2 is the best value 4K gaming monitor!
Image Quality
To start with, the IPS panel used in the MSI MAG274UPF E2 offers a wide 98% DCI-P3 color gamut for vibrant and lifelike colors, and there’s a working sRGB mode.
In addition to the wide color gamut, you also get a decent 400-nit peak brightness and a standard 1,000:1 static contrast ratio.
The MSI MAG274UPF E2 supports a variable refresh rate with a 48-144Hz dynamic range, AMD FreeSync Premium certification and stable G-SYNC performance.
Further, the monitor has a rapid 1ms GtG pixel response time speed with excellent overdrive implementation, so there’s no ghosting or overshoot in fast-paced games.
Other features include crosshair overlays, Night Vision and customizable picture presets.
Design & Connectivity

The design is robust and versatile with a good range of ergonomics, such as +/- 30° swivel, +/- 90° pivot, 130mm height adjustment, -5°/20° tilt and 75x75mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.1 inputs, DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, USB-C (DP 1.4 Alt Mode, 15W PD) and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
MSI offers a few different models with similar names but different features. Since pricing and availability varies, make sure you check them all out and pick the cheapest one or according to your preference of the features.
| MAG 274UPF | MAG 274UPF E2 | MAG 274RFW | MPG 274URF-QD | |
| USB-C Power Delivery | 65W | 15W | 15W | 65W |
| USB Hub / KVM | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Refresh Rate | 144Hz | 160Hz | 160Hz | 160Hz |
| Color Gamut | 129% sRGB | 133% sRGB | 133% sRGB | 145% sRGB |
Here are a few more models worth considering.
- KTC H27P22S, Acer XB273K V3 – monitors based on the same (or similar) panel without USB-C / KVM; can be found at a bit lower price on sale
- Acer XB283K KV – a 28″ 4K 144Hz IPS model with KVM and a USB-C port that also has 65W Power Delivery, but it can be up to $100 more expensive
- LG 27GR93U – with hardware calibration support
Best HDR Gaming Monitors
While some of the above-mentioned monitors do offer a decent HDR image quality, they can’t hold a candle to the following ‘true HDR’ displays!
AOC Q27G40XMN
Best Budget HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 180Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High peak brightness, decent pixel density, wide color gamut
- 1152-zone mini LED FALD
- Decent response time, low input lag
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 180FPS
The Cons:
- Minor blooming/haloing noticeable in certain scenes
- Minor ghosting
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
- Tilt-only stand
About The Monitor
Update: We also recommend checking out the KTC M27T6. It has DisplayHDR 1400, an ergonomic stand, DisplayPort 1.4 and a USB for firmware updates, though its brightness is a bit brighter than intended in HDR and it has less DCI-P3 gamut coverage.
The AOC Q27G40XMN is the cheapest monitor available with proper HDR support thanks to its 1152-zone mini LED FALD!
Image Quality
With 1152 zones, you can get exceptional HDR image quality with deep blacks and a high 1200-nit peak brightness.

In fact, the first full-array local dimming displays had 384 dimming zones and went for $2,000! Check out our ASUS PG27UQ review for more info.
The AOC Q27G40XMN has a wide 97% DCI-P3 gamut coverage for vibrant colors.
VRR is supported up to 180Hz for tear-free gameplay, and you get plenty of extra features, including Shadow Boost, Game Color, on-screen timers and a crosshair overlay.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is tilt-only, but it’s VESA mount compatible via the 100x100mm pattern.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.0 ports, DP 1.2 and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- KTC M27T6 – with higher brightness (DisplayHDR 1400) but not as accurate HDR image
Xiaomi G Pro 27i
Best Budget IPS HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 27″ Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 180Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High peak brightness, decent pixel density, wide color gamut
- 1152-zone mini LED FALD
- Quick response time, low input lag
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 180FPS
- Fully ergonomic stand
The Cons:
- Minor blooming/haloing noticeable in certain scenes
About The Monitor
Update: We now recommend the Acer XV275U F3biipprx instead.
If you want something a bit better, there’s the Xiaomi G Pro 27i!
Image Quality
The Xiaomi G Pro 27i has an IPS panel with a wider 97% Adobe RGB and 99% DCI-P3 color gamut for much more vibrant colors, as well as wider viewing angles and a more consistent image, which makes it suitable for color-critical work too.
Further, it has an 1152-zone mini LED FALD backlight and a high peak brightness of a bit over 1,000-nits.
The main advantage over the AOC Q27G40XMN is the faster pixel response time speed for no ghosting and smooth VRR performance without prominent brightness flickering.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers height up to 120mm, pivot by 90°, -5°/20° tilt, +/- 45° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include two DisplayPort 1.4 inputs, two HDMI 2.0 ports and a headphone jack.
Innocn 27M2V
Best 27″ 4K HDR Gaming Display
Size: 27” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 160Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High peak brightness, high pixel density, wide color gamut
- 1152-zone mini LED FALD
- Quick response time, low input lag
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 144FPS
- Fully ergonomic stand and rich connectivity options, including KVM and USB-C with 90W PD
The Cons:
- Minor blooming/haloing noticeable in certain scenes
About The Monitor
Update: We now recommend the KTC M27P6 instead. It has a higher-tier DisplayHDR 1400 certification with a 1800-nit peak brightness, as well as a 1080p 320Hz Dual Mode at a lower price.
If you can afford something a bit better, check out the Innocn 27M2V with a 4K UHD resolution and an 1152-zone mini LED FALD backlight.
Image Quality
Its higher 4K resolution results in a higher pixel density and therefore sharper details, but it’s also a lot more demanding on your GPU. So, we only recommend the Innocn 27M2V model if you have a high-end PC rig and/or need the monitor for work.
The 1152-zone FALD also ensures that there are fewer blooming artifacts, while the other specifications are very similar to the Xiaomi G Pro 27i, including a 1200-nit peak brightness, 99% Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 color gamut coverage and a rapid 1ms GtG pixel response time speed.
Useful features include VRR support up to 165FPS (up to 144FPS with NVIDIA GPUs), Shadow Boost, crosshair overlays, a refresh rate tracker and PiP/PbP support.
Design & Connectivity

Alternatives
In case the Innocn 27M2V is not available in your region, check out the Redmagic 4K Gaming Monitor with the same panel and local dimming solution.
If neither is available and you want a 27″ 4K HDR display, you’ll have to settle with the Cooler Master Tempest GP27U, the KTC M27P20 Pro or the Acer XV275K P3 as an alternative. These three displays use the same panel with a fewer 576-zone FALD backlight yet they cost around the same as the 1152-zone models.
There’s also the LG 27GR95UM with a 1560-zone mini LED FALD backlight, but it currently has local dimming algorithm issues, so we can only recommend it once (or if) it gets a proper firmware update.
LG OLED42C4
Best 42″ HDR Gaming Display
Size: 42” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 144Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, wide color gamut, high peak brightness
- No backlight bleed or IPS/VA glow
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 120Hz
- Quick response time speed
- HDMI 2.1, USB hub
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as some high-end OLED and LED-backlit displays
- Burn-in not covered by warranty
About The TV
Update: We now recommend the newer C5 variant.
Although not a monitor, LG’s OLED TVs deliver an otherworldly gaming experience for both immersion and responsiveness. They’re actually cheaper than some worse big format gaming monitors.
Image Quality
LG’s C4 line-up includes a 42″ variant, which is much more practical for desktop use than some of the previous-gen (the C1) smallest models with a 48″ screen size.
Now, with 4K resolution on the 41.5″ viewable screen of the LG OLED42C4, you get a rather decent pixel density of 106.16 PPI.
Want to know the best part? The main asset of OLED technology is, of course, the infinite contrast ratio as each pixel produces its own light.
Other specs aren’t too shabby either and include a wide 98% DCI-P3 color gamut, impeccable 178° viewing angles and a peak brightness of 700-nits (180-nits sustainable for 100% white window in SDR).
Further, LG’s OLED panels have a WBGR subpixel layout instead of the more common RGB. This results in some color fringing with small text, but it’s mainly noticeable when looking at it from up close. You won’t notice it in games and videos.
When it comes to gaming, the LG C4 boasts an instantaneous 1ms pixel response time speed for zero ghosting and low input lag of ~14ms at 60Hz and ~7ms at 120Hz, which makes for imperceptible delay (Game Mode must be enabled).
Features
Moving on, the TV has a native 120Hz refresh rate, which is supported at 4K, 1440p and 1080p.
The G-SYNC Compatible mode is supported over HDMI 2.1 with RTX 20-series and GTX 16-series GPUs (or newer) with a 40-120Hz variable refresh rate range. It also supports FreeSync Premium (with HDR) over HDMI with a 40-120Hz range!
Now, the main downside of OLED TVs is the risk of permanent image burn-in, but unless you leave a static picture on your TV for hours, you have nothing to worry about.
The TV offers plenty of features to prevent this, such as Screen Shift, Automatic Pixel Refresher and Logo Luminance Adjustment. Besides HDR10 support, the LG C4 TVs also support Dolby Vision and HLG HDR formats.
Design & Connectivity

The LG OLED42C4 has a design with legs to better fit on a regular PC desk, but there are no ergonomic adjustments apart from VESA mount compatibility. It has a glossy screen finish for a more vibrant image quality, but it’s reflective.
Connectivity options include four HDMI 2.1 ports, RJ45, tuner, composite-in, both analog and digital audio jacks, three USB 2.0 ports, WiFi, Bluetooth and dual 10W integrated speakers (no subwoofer though).
Alternatives
- ASUS PG42UQ – Based on the same panel with a 138Hz factory overclocked refresh rate, matte anti-glare coating, a heatsink for a bit higher brightness and a DisplayPort input; however, it doesn’t have any smart TV features or Dolby Vision support, and it goes for $1,050 – $1,400. While it is better for PC use overall (unless you prefer a glossy screen finish), it’s not worth the extra $500 over the C4 that can be found for $900.
MSI MPG 271QRX
Best 27″ 360Hz HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: QD-OLED Refresh Rate: 360Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 360Hz
- Fully ergonomic design and rich connectivity options, including KVM and USB-C with 90W PD
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
If you want an OLED display in a more practical 27″ form factor, the MSI MPG 271QRX is for you!
Image Quality
Based on a 1440p 360Hz QD-OLED panel, the MSI MPG 271QRX delivers both responsive gameplay and immersive image quality with crisp details, low input lag, vibrant colors and punchy highlights.
It has a high peak brightness of 250-nits SDR and up to 1000-nits for small HDR highlights.
The OLED drawbacks are present here too, of course, so the risk of burn-in might dissuade some users, but Dell offers a 3-year warranty that covers burn-in. Further, the monitor uses Samsung’s 3rd-gen QD-OLED panel with an improved subpixel layout, so fringing on small text and fine details is minimal.
Design & Connectivity

The stand offers height adjustment up to 110mm, -5°/15° tilt, +/- 30° swivel, +/- 90° pivot and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
It has a heatsink for cooling and a semi-glossy screen finish for a more vivid image, but it’s reflective and raises the black level when hit with direct lighting.
Connectivity options include DP 1.4, two 48 Gbps HDMI 2.1 ports, USB-C (DP Alt Mode and 90W Power Delivery), a headphone jack, a built-in KVM and a dual-USB 2.0 hub (2 downstream + 1 upstream).
Alternatives
| Dell AW2725DF | MSI MPG 271QRX | MSI MAG 271QPX | Samsung G60SD | Gigabyte FO27Q3 | ASUS XG27ACDNG | |
| Screen | Glossy | Glossy | Glossy | Matte | Glossy | Glossy |
| Video Ports | 2x DP 1.4,HDMI 2.0* | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 90W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 15W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1 | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1USB-C 18W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 90W |
| Other Ports | 3x USB-A,USB-C | 2x USB-A,USB-B,HP | HP | 2x USB-A,USB-B,HP | 2x USB-A,USB-B,HP, Mic, 2x5W | 3x USB-A,USB-B,HP |
| Features | – | KVM | – | – | KVM | KVM,ELMB |
| Cooling | Active (Fan) | Passive (Heatsink) | Passive (Heatsink) | Passive (Pulsating Heat Pipes) | Passive (Heatsink) | Passive (Heatsink) |
| Burn-in warranty | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years |
| Price (MSRP) | $900 | $800 | $750 | $900 | $800 | $800 |
Note that there are also 1440p 240Hz – 280Hz QD-OLED models at a bit lower price if you don’t need such a high refresh rate, such as the Dell AW2725D, the MSI MAG 272QPW QD-OLED X28, the Gigabyte Aorus FO27Q2 and the AOC AG276QZD2.
Alternatively, consider the LG 27GS95QE or the ASUS XG27AQDMG.
These are 27″ 1440p 240Hz gaming monitors based on LG’s W-OLED panel with MLA+ technology for higher brightness.
LG’s model has a matte anti-glare coating, whereas the ASUS XG27AQDMG has a glossy screen surface with a polarizer – it offers a vivid image quality and while it’s reflective, it doesn’t raise blacks like the glossy QD-OLED displays.
They are also a bit more affordable ($650 – $750), but have an RWBG subpixel layout, which results in noticeable fringing on small text and fine details.
We don’t recommend other 27″ 1440p 240Hz W-OLED models as they lack the MLA+ technology, resulting in notably lower brightness.
ASUS PG27AQDP
Best 27″ OLED Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 2560×1440 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 480Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 480Hz, BFI up to 240Hz
- Fully ergonomic design
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
Update: We now recommend the MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50 instead. It’s cheaper yet its QD-OLED panel has significantly brighter image quality.
If you need an even higher refresh rate, there’s the ASUS PG27AQDP with 480Hz!
Image Quality
The ASUS PG27AQDP is a 27″ 1440p 480Hz gaming monitor based on LG’s W-OLED panel with the RGWB subpixel layout for no prominent fringing on fine details and improved brightness performance of 275-nits 100% APL, 750-nits 10% APL and 1300-nits for < 3% APL.
Besides VRR support up to 480Hz and standard gaming features, such as crosshair overlays, on-screen timers, Shadow Boost, etc., the PG27AQDP also offers ELMB BFI technology up to 240Hz!
ELMB BFI inserts black frames between real frames to reduce perceived motion blur at the cost of image brightness, which is reduced to ~200-nits – still usable under normal lighting conditions. As a result, you get similar motion clarity to that of native 480Hz, which is perfect for games you can’t get over 240FPS!
You can also use BFI at 120Hz (for motion clarity of 240Hz), but this technology doesn’t work at the same time as VRR or HDR.
Check out our full PG27AQDP review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers height adjustment up to 110mm, +/- 30° swivel, -5°/20° tilt, +/- 90° pivot and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
The screen has a matte anti-glare coating that diffuses reflections but adds a bit of graininess to the image (only slightly noticeable on solid colors).
Connectivity options include DP 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports with DSC, a dual-USB 3.0 hub and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- LG 27GX790A – hardware calibration support, 2-year warranty
- Sony Inzone M10S – 3-year warranty
In Q2 2025, we’re also expecting 27″ 1440p 500Hz gaming monitors based on Samsung’s QD-OLED panels with improved HDR 500 True Black support.
ASUS XG27UCDMG
Best 27″ HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 27” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: QD-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz, BFI up to 120Hz
- Fully ergonomic design, USB-C 90W PD, KVM
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
If you’d rather have a 27″ OLED monitor with a higher 4K UHD resolution, the ASUS XG27UCDMG is for you!
Image Quality
The ASUS XG27UCDMG is based on a QD-OLED panel, providing you with the higher perceived brightness thanks to its wider color gamut and higher color volume in comparison to W-OLED panels.
The 4K UHD resolution on a 27″ sized screens provides you with a pixel density of 166 PPI, resulting in incredibly crisp details and text. The fringing issues of the uncommon subpixel layout are also completely gone.
Other specifications are typical for QD-OLED panels, such as the 99.3% DCI-P3 color gamut, true 10-bit color depth, 178° wide viewing angles and 1000-nits peak brightness for 3% APL, 250-nits for 100% APL.
The ASUS XG27UCDMG also has dedicated sRGB color mode, along with the typical gaming features, such as crosshair overlays, Shadow Boost, on-screen timers, VRR up to 240Hz, advanced OLED Care, etc. It also supports BFI up to 120Hz.
Check out our full ASUS XG27UCDMG review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 120mm, +/- 90° pivot, +/- 45° swivel, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility. There’s also a 1/4″ tripod socket, RGB lighting and a phone groove/holder on the stand.
Connectivity options include DP 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports, a headphone jack, three USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port with DP Alt Mode and 90W PD.
The monitor has the same semi-glossy finish as most QD-OLED panels.
Alternatives
| Dell AW2725Q | ASUS XG27UCDMG | ASUS PG27UCDM | MSI MPG 272URX | Samsung G81SF | |
| Screen | Glossy | Glossy | Glossy | Glossy | Matte |
| Dolby Vision | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
| USB-C (PD) | N/A | 90W | 90W | 98W | N/A |
| KVM | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A |
| DisplayPort | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.4 |
| Cooling | Active | Passive | Passive | Passive | Passive |
| BFI | N/A | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Advanced OLED Care | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Price (MSRP) | $900 | $1100 | $1300 | $1200 | $1300 |
There’s also the MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED X24 variant without KVM and with USB-C with lower 15W PD for $800.
MSI MPG 321URX
Best 32″ QD-OLED HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 32” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: QD-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- High pixel density
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Ergonomic design and rich connectivity options, including KVM and USB-C with 90W PD
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
In case you’d rather have a higher resolution and a bigger screen, we recommend the MSI MPG 321URX.
Image Quality
The MSI MPG 321URX is a 32″ 4K QD-OLED display, providing you with a high pixel density for sharp details and text, while VRR up to 240Hz ensures buttery-smooth performance.
Just like the other QD-OLED models, the MSI MPG 321URX has a wide 99.3% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage, a 250-nit SDR peak brightness and up to 1,000-nits for small HDR highlights, as well as excellent Delta E < 2 factory calibration for both sRGB, Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 color modes.
You also get the standard gaming features, such as Night Vision, crosshair overlays, on-screen timers, etc.
Check out our full MSI MPG 321URX review for more details.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers a good range of ergonomics, including up to 110mm height adjustment, -5°/15° tilt, +/- 30° swivel, +/- 10° pivot for balancing and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
It has a heatsink for cooling and a semi-glossy screen finish for a more vivid image, but it’s reflective and raises the black level when hit with direct lighting.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps and CEC support, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 90W Power Delivery, a dual-USB 2.0 hub (2 downstream + 1 upstream type B), a headphone jack and built-in KVM functionality.
Alternatives
The MSI MPG 321URX is the most affordable 32″ 4K 240Hz QD-OLED model in the US, going for just $950. However, in other regions, the following alternatives might be cheaper.
| Dell AW3225QF | MSI 321CURX | ASUS PG32UCDM | Samsung G80SD | Gigabyte FO32U2 | Gigabyte FO32U2P | MSI 321URX | MSI 321UPX | HP Omen Transcend 32 | |
| Screen | Glossy (Curved) | Glossy (Curved) | Glossy | Matte | Glossy | Glossy | Glossy | Glossy | Glossy |
| Video Ports | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1 | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 98W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 90W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1 | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 18W | DP 2.1,mini-DP 2.1,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 65W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 90W | DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 15W | DP 2.1,2x HDMI 2.1,USB-C 140W |
| Other Ports | 3x USB-A,USB-B,USB-C | 2x USB-A,USB-B | 3x USB-AUSB-B,HP, SPDIF | 2x USB-A,USB-B | 2x USB-A,USB-B,HP, Mic,2x5W | 2x USB-A,USB-B,HP, Mic, 2x5W | 2x USB-A,USB-B,HP | HP | 3x USB-A,2x USB-C,HP, 4x3W |
| Dolby Vision | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| KVM | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Cooling | Active | Passive | Passive | Passive | Passive | Passive | Passive | Passive | Active |
| Burn-in warranty | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years |
| Price (MSRP) | $1200 | $850 | $1300 | $1300 | $1100 | $1200 | $900 | $800 | $1,300 |
MSI also offers the MSI MPG 321URXW with white design and the MSI MPG 322URX with DisplayPort 2.1 (80 Gbps).
Note that there are also cheaper 32″ 4K 165Hz QD-OLED models, such as the MSI MGA 321UP.
In 2025, we’re also expecting 27″ 4K 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitors. Check out our OLED monitors article for more details.
ASUS PG32UCDP
Best 32″ W-OLED HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 32” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 4K 240Hz (1080p 480Hz)
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- High pixel density
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz, 1080p 480Hz Dual Mode, and BFI up to 120Hz
- Ergonomic design and rich connectivity options, including KVM and USB-C 90W PD
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
The ASUS PG32UCDP is a 32″ 4K 240Hz OLED gaming monitor with a 1080p 480Hz Dual Mode!
Image Quality
The ASUS PG32UCDP is based on a W-OLED panel with an improved subpixel layout, so it won’t have any fringing on small details and text like the older W-OLED models.
Further, it has improved brightness performance with up to 275-nits for 100% APL and up to 1300-nits for < 3% APL. Note that these measures refer to white luminance, so QD-OLED panels still have a higher perceived brightness thanks to their wider color gamut and higher color volume.
The ASUS PG32UCDP still offers incredible HDR image quality thanks to its 98.5% DCI-P3 wide color gamut, excellent brightness and infinite contrast ratio.
It supports VRR up to 240Hz and offers standard gaming features, such as Shadow Boost, crosshair overlays and on-screen timers.
Its main feature is the 1080p 480Hz mode. Keep in mind that since the monitor will be displaying a non-native resolution in this mode, the image will be a bit blurrier, but 480Hz is definitely worth it as the blurriness won’t be that noticeable in games.
Check out our full ASUS PG32UCDP review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 110mm, +/- 15° swivel, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility. The screen has a matte anti-glare coating that adds a bit of graininess to the image (mainly noticeable on solid colors), but efficiently prevents reflections.
Connectivity options include DP 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 90W PD, three downstream USB-A 3.0 ports, a headphone jack and SPDIF.
Alternatives
- LG 32GS95UE – LG’s model based on the same panel, however, it doesn’t have USB-C, KVM nor ELMB. Moreover, its burn-in warranty is only 2 years
- ASUS XG32UCWMG – model with glossy screen surface
Innocn 32M2V
Best 4K IPS Mini LED Gaming Monitor
Size: 32” Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 144Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High pixel density
- Accurate and vibrant colors
- Plenty of features including VRR up to 144Hz, PiP/PbP
- Fully ergonomic stand and rich connectivity options, KVM, USB-C 90W PD
The Cons:
- Minor blooming/haloing noticeable in certain scenes
About The Monitor
Update: We now recommend the KTC M32P10 instead.
In case you want a flat-screen 32″ high refresh rate HDR gaming monitor, we recommend the Innocn 32M2V.
Image Quality
Since it uses an IPS panel with a lower native contrast ratio and has fewer dimming zones, the Innocn 32M2V will have more blooming artifacts than the Neo G7.
However, you get wider viewing angles, smoother VRR performance and a wider color gamut with 99% Adobe RGB / DCI-P3 coverage! It also gets a lot brighter when it comes to larger APLs.
So, the choice between these two models mainly comes down to personal preference. Check out our Innocn 32M2V review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand is sturdy and offers height adjustment up to 80mm, +/- 25° swivel, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth, DP 1.4 with DSC, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 90W PD, two 5W built-in speakers, a headphone jack and a dual-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
- Innocn 32A6V – the same monitor with a darker design
BenQ EX321UX
Premium 32″ 4K HDR IPS Gaming Monitor
Size: 32″ Resolution: 3840×2160 Panel: IPS Refresh Rate: 144Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High pixel density
- Accurate and vibrant colors
- Plenty of features including VRR up to 144Hz
- Fully ergonomic stand and rich connectivity options, KVM, USB-C 65W PD
The Cons:
- Minor blooming/haloing noticeable in certain scenes
About The Monitor
In case the Innocn 32M2V is not available or you want a more premium model, check out the BenQ Mobiuz EX321UX!
Image Quality
The BenQ EX321UX has the same 1152-zone mini LED FALD backlight and a wide 99% Adobe RGB / DCI-P3 color gamut.
The main advantages of the EX321UX include a better-tuned local dimming algorithm for no flickering, premium build quality with a directional joystick and a remote controller, and a better 3-year warranty.
For more information, be sure to check out our in-depth BenQ EX321UX review.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers height adjustment up to 100mm, -5°/20° tilt, +/- 15° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 2.1 (UHBR10), three HDMI 2.1 ports with 48 Gbps (one with eARC), USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 65W PD, a headphone jack and a USB hub (three USB-A 3.0 and two USB-C ports).
Alternatives
- Acer Predator X32FP / ASUS PG32UQXR – go for around the same price yet have fewer dimming zones (576)
- ViewSonic XG321UG / ASUS PG32UQX – 1152 dimming zones with the G-SYNC Ultimate module, but they go for ~$2,000 and have a slower response time speed and no HDMI 2.1
Best UltraWide HDR Gaming Monitors
Want an ultrawide display with proper HDR support? Check out the best models!
Dell AW3423DWF
Best Value UltraWide HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 34” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: QD-OLED Refresh Rate: 165Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, wide color gamut, high peak brightness
- No backlight bleed or IPS/VA glow
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 165Hz
- Quick response time speed
- Ergonomic design, USB hub
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
If you’re looking for something a bit different for an incredible HDR gaming experience, you should get the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF with an ultrawide panel.
Image Quality
The Dell AW3423DWF even has an OLED panel that’s enhanced with quantum dots (QD-OLED), which offers several important advantages over LG’s OLEDs.
To start with, the monitor can get a lot brighter with a 1,000-nits peak and 250-nits sustainable brightness. So, you get more vivid details!
Next, it has a wider color gamut with 99.3% DCI-P3 coverage (with adjustable sRGB and DCI-P3 color modes available and calibrated at Delta E < 2) for more vibrant and saturated colors, which also further increases perceived brightness.
Finally, its QD-OLED panel is more resistant to burn-in and image retention; you even get a three-year warranty that covers burn-in!
Just like every OLED panel, the AW3423DWF has an essentially infinite contrast ratio and instantaneous pixel response time speed.
Further, VRR is supported up to 165FPS for tear-free gameplay. However, MBR or BFI is not available.
Other features include crosshair overlays, Dark Stabilizer (improves visibility in dark scenes), on-screen timers, a refresh rate tracker and various picture presets.
While the 3440×1440 resolution is lower than 4K UHD, you actually get a slightly higher pixel density of 110 PPI in comparison to 42″ 4K displays, resulting in sharper details – and it’s a lot easier on your GPU. Moreover, due to the ultrawide format, you get an extended field of view in compatible content.
Note that the AW3423DWF has regular RGB subpixels but in a triangular layout. So, some minor color fringing is noticeable on small text when looking at it up close, but you won’t see this in games and videos.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is robust and versatile with up to 110mm height adjustment, -5°/21° tilt, +/- 20° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
The screen has an 1800R curvature for added immersion and a semi-glossy finish, so it offers more vivid image quality in comparison to matte anti-glare displays, but it’s not quite as clear (or reflective) as LG’s OLED panels.
Connectivity options include two DisplayPort 1.4 inputs, HDMI 2.0 (limited to 100Hz), a headphone jack, line-out and a quad-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
Samsung, Philips and MSI also have models based on the same panel. You can check out how they compare in the table below.
There are many monitors that use the same QD-OLED panel, offering a similar image quality and performance. However, they still have some differences in features, warranty, connectivity options, price, HDR accuracy, etc. Here’s how the most popular models compare:
| Dell AW3423DWF | Dell AW3423DW | MSI MEG342C | MSI 341CQP | Samsung OLED G85SB / G85SD | Philips Evnia 34M2C8600 | |
| Max. Refresh Rate | 165Hz (120Hz 10-bit) | 175Hz (144Hz 10-bit) | 175Hz 10-bit | 175Hz 10-bit | 175Hz 10-bit | 175Hz 10-bit |
| Ports | 2x DP 1.4,1x HDMI 2.0,4x USB | 1x DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.0,4x USB | 1x DP 1.42x HDMI 2.11x USB-C (65W PD)4x USB | 1x DP 1.42x HDMI 2.11x USB-C,2x USB | 1x Mini-DP 1.4,1x micro HDMI 2.11x USB-C (65W PD)1x USB-C | 1x DP 1.4,2x HDMI 2.0,1x USB-C (90W PD),4x USB |
| Cooling fans | 1 | 2 | 1 | None | None | 1 |
| HDR(AMD GPUs) | Good | Good | Good | Good | Bad* | Bad** |
| HDR(NVIDIA GPUs) | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Bad** |
| PiP/PbP | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Ambient Light Sensor | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Updatable Firmware | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Other Notable Features | N/A | G-SYNC module | KVM switch | KVM Switch | Tizen OS | KVM SwitchAmbiglow RGB |
| Price (MSRP) | $1,100 | $1,300 | $1,100 | $900 | $1,500 | $800 |
| Burn-in Warranty (in the US) | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | N/A | N/A |
The pricing and warranty can vary by region. Generally, we recommend going with the Dell AW3423DWF or the MSI MAG 341CQP due to their price and warranty that covers burn-in.
There are also 34″ 3440×1440 240Hz W-OLED gaming monitors available, such as the ASUS PG34WCDM and the LG 34GS95QE.
While they offer a higher refresh rate and higher white luminance, their W-OLED panel has more noticeable fringing issues, not as high color volume or as wide color gamut and a steep 800R screen curvature. These are available as 39″ 3440×1440 240Hz variants too, such as the LG 39GS95QE.
We recommend the MSI MPG 341CQPX. It’s a 34″ 3440×1440 240Hz QD-OLED model with USB-C and KVM that can be found for $750, offering the best value for the money.
Check out our OLED monitors article for more information.
MSI MPG 341CQPX
Best UltraWide HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 34” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: QD-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, wide color gamut, high peak brightness
- No backlight bleed or IPS/VA glow
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Quick response time speed
- Ergonomic design and rich connectivity options, including KVM and USB-C with 98W PD
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
The MSI MPG 341CQPX features a newer 34″ 3440×1440 QD-OLED panel with a higher 240Hz refresh rate!
Image Quality
Besides the small but noticeable boost in motion clarity, there are no other big improvements over the Dell AW3423DWF. So, some users might prefer to save up to $200 by going with Dell’s model.
MSI’s model does provide you with a few excellent features, including passive cooling via a heatsink (instead of an audible fan), a USB-C port with DP Alt Mode and 98W PD, an integrated KVM switch and HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps.
Check out our in-depth MSI MPG 341CQPX review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The monitor’s stand is robust and offers height adjustment up to 100mm, -5°/20° tilt, +/- 30° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
It has the same glossy screen surface and 1800R curvature as the Dell AW3423DWF.
Connectivity options include DP 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 98W PD, a dual-USB 3.0 hub and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- Dell Alienware AW3425DW – same panel without USB-C or KVM, but can be $50 less
There are also 34″ 3440×1440 240Hz W-OLED gaming monitors available, such as the ASUS PG34WCDM and the LG 34GS95QE.
While they offer a higher white luminance, their W-OLED panel has more noticeable fringing issues, not as high color volume and gamut and a steep 800R screen curvature
LG 39GS95QE
Best 39″ UltraWide HDR Gaming Monitor
Size: 39” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, wide color gamut, high peak brightness
- No backlight bleed or IPS/VA glow
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Quick response time speed
- Ergonomic design, USB hub
- 2-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of permanent image burn-in and temporary image retention
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
In case you want a larger ultrawide OLED gaming monitor, the LG 39GS95QE might be for you!
Image Quality
The LG 39GS95QE offers a larger 39″ screen than the MSI MPG 341CQPX, providing you with a more immersive viewing experience.
However, keep in mind that it still has the same 3440×1440 screen resolution, which on its larger screen results in a lower pixel density of 95 PPI (similar to that of 32″ 1440p displays), so text and detail clarity won’t be as good.
Additionally, the LG 39GS95QE uses LG’s W-OLED panel with the old RWBG subpixel layout (instead of the new RGWB), so there will be noticeable fringing on small text and fine details.
The middling pixel density and odd subpixel layout issues aren’t that noticeable in games and videos, but if you plan on using the monitor for work that involves a lot of reading and typing, you might be bothered by it.
Sadly, larger ultrawide OLED monitors with higher pixel density and better subpixel layouts aren’t expected before 2025. So, if you want an ultrawide OLED monitor bigger than 34″, the 39GS95QE is one of your best options.
Other than that, the monitor offers an incredible HDR image quality thanks to its OLED panel with infinite contrast ratio, wide 98.5% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage (with sRGB emulation mode) and excellent brightness performance (1300-nits white luminance for < 3% APL and 275-nits peak for 100% APL).
Check out our full LG 39GS95QE review for more details.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers a good range of ergonomics, including up to 120mm height adjustment, +/- 10° swivel, -10°/15° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
The screen has a steep 800R curvature for added immersion and a bit heavier matte anti-glare coating that adds some graininess to the image (mainly noticeable on solid colors) but it efficiently prevents reflections.
Connectivity options are abundant and include DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, two HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth, a headphone jack (with DTS Headphone:X support) and a dual-USB 3.0 hub.
Alternatives
- ASUS ROG Swift PG39WCDM – ASUS’ model based on the same panel with KVM, USB-C (90W Power Delivery, DP Alt Mode), BFI up to 120Hz and a better 3-year burn-in warranty. No word on pricing and availability yet though.
Corsair Xeneon Flex
Premium UltraWide OLED Gaming Monitor
Size: 45” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Bendable screen, USB hub
- 3-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of burn-in
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
- Tilt-only stand
- Expensive
- Low pixel density
About The Monitor
Want something even more extravagant? The Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 has a bendable OLED screen!
Image Quality
This giant 45″ screen has a screen resolution of 3440×1440, so you won’t get the ideal pixel density (83 PPI, similar to 27″ 1080p). Still, since you’ll be sitting further away from the screen, the individual pixels won’t be that noticeable in games and videos.
The Xeneon Flex has a 98% DCI-P3 gamut coverage for vibrant colors, a decent peak brightness (800-nits < 3%APL, 600-nits 10% APL, though rather low 150-nits for 100% APL) and VRR support for tear-free gameplay up to 240FPS.
The screen can be bent from completely flat to 800R, allowing you to adjust it perfectly to your preference. Other features include crosshair overlays, a refresh rate tracker and PiP/PbP support.
Design & Connectivity

The stand is tilt-only by ~22° and while its legs are removable, the screen is not VESA mount compatible. You can get the desk clamp adapter separately though.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.1 ports, DP 1.4 with DSC, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 30W PD, a quad-USB 3.0 hub and a headphone jack.
LG 45GS95QE
45″ UltraWide OLED Gaming Monitor
Size: 45” Resolution: 3440×1440 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Ergonomic stand, USB hub
- 2-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of burn-in
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
- Low pixel density
About The Monitor
Update: We now recommend the LG 45GX900A instead.
If you’re looking for a similar but cheaper 45″ ultrawide gaming monitor without a bendable screen, you should check out the LG 45GS95QE.
Image Quality
The LG 45GS95QE has a fixed 800R screen curvature, but it’s also available for as low as $1,100.
Moreover, it features an MLA+ W-OLED panel with a notably higher brightness of up to 1300-nits for < 3% APL, 750-nits for 10% APL and 275-nits for 100% APL.
Other specifications include VRR support up to 240Hz, 98.5% DCI-P3 wide color gamut with an sRGB emulation mode available, Black Stabilizer, crosshair overlays, PiP/PbP and hardware calibration support.
Check out our LG 45GS96QB review for more details – it’s the same monitor but with a different stand, integrated 7W speakers and a USB-C port (65W) for $100 extra.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor is sturdy and offers a good range of ergonomics, including up to 120mm height adjustment, +/- 10° swivel, -1°/15° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 1.4, two HDMI 2.1 ports, a dual-USB 3.0 hub and a headphone jack with DTS Headphone:X support.
Alternatives
The LG 45GR95QE is the older version of this monitor. It can be found for $1,000, but it has notably lower brightness performance (similar to the Xeneon Flex).
The LG 45GS96QB uses the same panel as the 45GS95QE, but has a different design, dual 7W integrated speakers and a USB-C port with DP Alt Mode and 65W Power Delivery. Usually, it’s $100 more expensive than the 45GS95QE.
LG 45GX950A
Best UltraWide OLED Gaming Monitor
Size: 45” Resolution: 5120×2160 Panel: W-OLED Refresh Rate: 165Hz, 2560×1080 330Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, decent peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 165Hz (330Hz in Dual Mode)
- Ergonomic stand, USB hub, USB-C 90W PD
- 2-year warranty that covers burn-in
The Cons:
- Risk of burn-in
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
If you want a 45″ ultrawide monitor with an OLED panel and a higher screen resolution, you’re going to love the LG 45GX950A with the 5K2K resolution!
Image Quality
The LG 45GX950A has a screen resolution of 5120×2160 pixels, which results in a high pixel density of 125 PPI on its 44.5″ viewable screen, providing you with crisp image quality.
Moreover, it has the RGWB subpixel layout, so there’s no noticeable fringing on small text and fine details, while its MLA+ panel ensures strong brightness performance with up to 1300-nits peak for small 1% APL highlights and a respectable 275-nits for 100% APL.
Other specs include a 98.5% DCI-P3 gamut coverage with an sRGB mode and the typical gaming features, such as Black Stabilizer, crosshair overlays, etc.
The monitor also features the 2560×1080 330Hz Dual Mode, but since it results in a low pixel density, most users will find the image too blurry in this mode. On the other hand, some gamers might find the lower image quality tolerable.
There’s also hardware calibration support and PiP/PbP modes. Check out our full LG 45GX950A review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 120mm, +10°/15° tilt, +/- 10° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
The screen has a steep 800R curvature for added immersion and a bit heavier matte anti-glare coating that’s very efficient at diffusing reflections, but adds some graininess to the image (only slightly noticeable on solid colors).
Connectivity options include DP 2.1 (UHBR 13.5), two HDMI 2.1 ports, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 90W PD, two USB-A ports, a headphone jack and dual 10W integrated speakers.
Alternatives
LG also plans to release a version of this monitor with a bendable screen, the LG 45GX990A, as well as a 240Hz variant, but there’s no information regarding the release date and pricing for these models.
MSI MPG 491CQPX
Super-UltraWide OLED Gaming Monitor
Size: 49” Resolution: 5120×1440 Panel: QD-OLED Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- Infinite contrast ratio, high peak brightness, wide color gamut
- Instant response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Ergonomic design, KVM, USB-C 90W PD
The Cons:
- Risk of burn-in (not covered by warranty)
- Not as bright as mini LED displays
About The Monitor
If you want a super-ultrawide gaming monitor, the MSI MPG 491CQPX is the best model available and it has an alluring price tag considering its specs.
Image Quality
The MSI MPG 491CQPX uses Samsung’s QD-OLED panel with superior color gamut and brightness performance when compared to LG’s W-OLED panels.
You get an exceptional 99% DCI-P3 gamut coverage with a higher color volume (colors are brighter, not just whitepoint).
As for the brightness, the MSI MPG 491CQPX can maintain 250-nits for a 100% white window and reach up to 1000-nits for small HDR highlights, providing you with an immersive viewing experience.
It also offers smooth VRR performance up to 240Hz and the standard gaming feature set.
Note that the MSI MPG 491CQPX uses a second-gen QD-OLED panel that has much better text clarity with a lot less noticeable fringing on fine details in comparison to the first-gen panels and especially W-OLED panels.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 100mm, +/- 30° swivel, -5°/20° tilt and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility.
It uses the same screen coating as other QD-OLED panels, meaning that the image is more vivid, but also more reflective, and it has a moderate 1800R screen curvature for extra immersion.
Connectivity options include two HDMI 2.1 ports, DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, USB-C with DP Alt Mode and 98W PD, a dual-USB 3.0 hub and a headphone jack.
Alternatives
- Samsung OLED G9 – Samsung’s model that’s usually more expensive yet doesn’t have USB-C or KVM
- MSI MPG 491CQP – the cheaper model with 144Hz
Samsung Neo G95NC
57″ UltraWide Mini LED Gaming Monitor
Size: 57” Resolution: 7680×2160 Panel: VA Refresh Rate: 240Hz
See PriceThe Pros:
- High contrast ratio, impressive peak brightness, decent color gamut
- Fast response time
- Plenty of features, including VRR up to 240Hz
- Ergonomic stand, USB hub, KVM
The Cons:
- Expensive
- Noticeable blooming in some scenes
- VRR brightness flickering in dark scenes of games with fluctuating frame rates (expected drawback of OLED and VA panels)
About The Monitor
Still haven’t found the monitor you’re looking for? Check out the Samsung Neo G95NC with a 57″ 7680×2160 240Hz panel!
Image Quality
The Neo G95NC is virtually equivalent to two 32″ 4K displays side by side without the bezels in between them. This means that you’ll need quite a powerful PC rig to maintain playable framerates.
This 57″ super-ultrawide gaming monitor has a screen resolution of 7680×2160, so you will need a powerful PC rig to do it justice. Keep in mind that the RTX 40-series GPUs don’t support the maximum resolution of this monitor – they’re limited to 120Hz at 7680×2160, whereas AMD’s 7000-series cards support 240Hz.
However, even with the RTX 4090, you won’t be able to get over 120FPS at 7680×2160 with decent picture settings in most games. So, you can think of this monitor as an investment for your future GPU upgrades.
Next, the monitor can achieve a high peak brightness of 1300-nits for <10% white windows and up to 800-nits for a 100% full white field, while the 2392-zone mini LED FALD solution ensures excellent backlight control.
You also get a wide 95% DCI-P3 color gamut coverage, a rapid 1ms GtG response time speed and VRR up to 240Hz.
Check out our full Samsung G95NC review for more information.
Design & Connectivity

The stand of the monitor offers height adjustment up to 120mm, -5°/12° tilt, +/- 15° swivel and 100x100mm VESA mount compatibility, while the screen has a steep 1000R curvature for extra immersion.
Connectivity options include DisplayPort 2.1, three HDMI 2.1 ports, a headphone jack, four USB ports (2 downstream + 2 upstream) and built-in KVM.
Alternatives
If you’re looking for something similarly extravagant, check out the Samsung Odyssey Ark with a 55″ 4K 165Hz 1000R curved VA panel.
Conclusion
Did you find the best gaming monitor for you?
If you have any questions, feel free to leave a comment below!
Updates +
- November 27, 2025:– Replaced the LG 45GS95QE with the LG 45GX900A.
- November 24, 2025:– Removed the BenQ XL2566K, the ASUS PG248QP, The Gigabyte GS32Q, the LG 32GQ850, the LG 34GN850, the Dell AW3821DW, the LG 27G850A, the Arzopa M3RC, the Samsung S43CG70, the Xiaomi G Pro 27i, the Samsung Neo G7, the Corsair Xeneon Flex and the BenQ EX321UX.– Added the ASUS XG259CMS, the Innocn 25M2S, the Acer XV275U F3, The Acer X34 X0, and the Samsung 37″ and 40″ G75F.– Replaced the Gigabyte M32QC with the LG 32G600A, the Titan Army P2510S with the Sansui ES-G25F6Q-Pro, the MSI MAG274UPF E2 with the Gigabyte M27UP, the LG OLED C4 with C5, the Innocn 32M2V with the KTC M32P10, the ASUS PG32UCDP with the ASUS XG32UCWMG, the MSI MPG 271QRX with the Dell AW2725DF and the ASUS XG27UCDMG with the MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED X24. Review summaries will be added soon.
- July 9, 2025:– Added the KTC M27T6 and KTC M27P6 to the table. Review summaries will be added soon.
- May 30, 2025:– Replaced the HP Omen 27qs with the KTC H27E6.
- April 23, 2025:– Replaced the BenQ EX240 with the KTC H24F8, the Acer XV252QF with the Dell AW2523HF, the Koorui 27E6QC with 27E6QCA, the KTC H27T22S with H27T22, the AOC Q27G3XMN with Q27G40XMN, the Sceptre E325B with the Gigabyte GS32Q, the Acer XR343CKP with the LG 34GN850, the MSI MAG274UPF with MAG274UPF E2, the MSI MAG323UPF with the Arzopa M3RC, the MSI MPG 272URX with the ASUS XG27UCDMG.– Added the BenQ XL2586X+.
- March 26, 2025:– Added the MSI MPG 272URX, the LG 45GX950A and the LG 27G850A.
- January 17, 2025:– Replaced the Samsung OLED G9 with the MSI MPG 491CQPX.
- November 23, 2024:– Added review summaries for the Titan Army P2510S, the KTC H32S25E and the BenQ EX321UX.– Removed the Samsung Neo G95NA and the Odyssey G6.– Replaced the Innocn 27G1S with the KTC H27E22, and the LG OLED42C3 with the OLED42C4.– Added the Xiaomi G Pro 27i.
- September 16, 2024:– Added the Titan Army P2510S and the KTC H32S25E to the table. Review summaries will be added soon.
- September 11, 2024:– Added the ASUS PG27AQDP.
- August 2, 2024:– Replaced the LG 32GS95UE with the ASUS PG32UCDP.
- July 25, 2024:– Added the MSI MPG 341CQPX and the LG 45GS95QE.
- June 20, 2024:– Replaced the Acer XV271U M3 with the KTC H27T22S.
- May 31, 2024:– Replaced the ASUS PG329Q with the Sceptre E325B-QPN168, the Gigabyte G34WQCA with the KTC H34S18S, the Samsung C49G95T with the Samsung S49CG95.– Removed the Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q.– Added review summaries for the LG 32GS95UE and the LG 39GS95QE.
- April 2, 2024:– Replaced the Dell AW2725DF with the MSI MPG 271QRX, and the Dell AW3225QF with the MSI MPG 321URX.
- February 13, 2024:– Replaced the Samsung Odyssey G7 with G6, the Gigabyte M28U and M32U models with the MSI MAG274UPF and MAG323UPF models, the Acer X32FP with the Innocn 32M2V.– Added the Innocn 27G1S and the Dell AW3225QF review summary.
- January 16, 2024:– Replaced the ASUS PG27AQDM with the Dell AW2725DF.– Added the Dell AW3225QF.
- December 12, 2023:– Removed the ASUS XG249CM.– Replaced the LG 34GP83A with the Acer XR343CKP and the Gigabyte M34WQ with the Sceptre E345B-QUN168W.
- November 24, 2023:– Replaced the Dell S2522HG with the ASUS XG249CM.– Added the ASUS PG248QP.
- November 9, 2023:– Replaced the Gigbayte G27QCA with Koorui 27E6QC, the Gigabyte G32QCA with M32QC, The Acer XV272UV with Acer XV271UM3, the Gigabyte M32Q with ASUS PG329Q, the Acer XB283KKV with Gigabyte M27U, the LG 32GQ950 with Gigabyte M32U.– Added review summaries for the AOC Q27G3XMN, Samsung OLED G9, Samsung Neo G95NC and HP Omen 27qs.– Added the MSI MAG401QR.– Added more alternatives for most monitors.
- May 19, 2023:– Added review summaries for the ASUS PG27AQDM, the Innocn 27M2V, the Acer X32FP and the Corsair Xeneon Flex.– Replaced the Gigabyte FV43U with the Samsung S43CG70.
- April 6, 2023:– Replaced the LG 24GN600 with the Gigabyte G24F-2.
- December 27, 2022:– Added review summaries for the Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q and GP27U, the ASUS PG27AQN and the BenQ XL2566K.– Removed the LG OLED48C1 and the ASUS PG42UQ since the LG OLED42C2 is now often available for ~$900.
- November 24, 2022:– Replaced the Dell AW3423DW with AW3423DWF and the MSI G273QF with the Acer XV272UV.– Removed the Sony Inzone M9.
- October 14, 2022:– Checked up on the guide to ensure that our picks are still the best options available.
- August 29, 2022:– Replaced the LG 24GN650 with 24GN600, the Acer XB323UGX with the LG 32GQ850, and the MSI MPG321UR-QD with the LG 32GQ950.– Removed the MSI MAG274QRF-QD.– Added the Samsung Neo G7.
- July 5, 2022:– Replaced the LG 27GP950 with the Sony Inzone M9.
- June 15, 2022:– Replaced the AOC CU34G2X with the Gigabyte G34WQC-A.
- April 20, 2022:– Replaced the ASUS XG27AQM with the Gigabyte M27Q-X and the Acer XV252QF with the Acer Aopen 25XV2QF.– Added the LG OLED42C2.
- April 15, 2022:– Added the LG OLED42C2 to the table. A review summary will be added soon.
- March 14, 2022:– Replaced the ASUS PG32UQX with the Dell AW3423DW.
- February 8, 2022:– Replaced the Gigabyte M28U with the Acer XB283KKV.
- December 6, 2021:– Added review summaries for the monitors that were missing them.
- November 25, 2021:– Checked up on the guide to ensure that our picks are still the best options available.
- November 23, 2021:– Added best early Black Friday deals to the table.
- October 6, 2021:– Replaced the Gigabyte G34WQC (discontinued) with the AOC CU34G2X.
- September 8, 2021:– Replaced the LG 27GP850 with the MSI MAG274QRF-QD, the LG 32GP850 with the Gigabyte M32Q, and the Acer XV272UX with the ASUS XG27AQM.
- July 30, 2021:– Replaced the Dell AW2521H with the Acer XV252QF.– Replaced the LG OLED48CX with the LG OLED48C1.– Added the Gigabyte M32U and the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 to the table, review sections will be added soon.
- July 4, 2021:– Added a video for this guide.
- June 29, 2021:– Revamped the buyer’s guide – reduced the number of recommended monitors from 30 down to 17 for compactness and better readability. All the noteworthy monitors that were removed are now moved to ‘Alternatives.’
- May 26, 2021:– Replaced the LG 27GL850 with the updated 27GP850 model.
- May 7, 2021:– Replaced the ASUS PG259QN with the Dell AW2521H.
- March 27, 2021:– Added information about LG’s new firmware update for the CX OLEDs, which alleviates the near-black gamma VRR issue.
- February 9, 2021:– Added the LG 32GN650 as an alternative to the LG 32GK650F. It’s the updated model with a slightly different design and a slightly higher refresh rate.
- December 24, 2020:– Replaced the Dell AW2721D with the Acer XV272UX.
- December 9, 2020:– Added the BenQ EX2510 and the Dell AW2721D.– Replaced the AOC CU34G2X with the Gigabyte G34WQC.
You Might Love These Too
-
LG 34UC80 Review: 3440x1440 FreeSync UltraWide Curved Gaming Monitor -
LG 27UD58 Review: Budget 4K IPS FreeSync Gaming Monitor -
LG 34GK950G Review: 3440x1440 120Hz G-SYNC UltraWide Curved Gaming Monitor
Từ khóa » Fv43u Vs Lg C1
-
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U Vs LG 48 C1 OLED - Monitor
-
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U Vs LG C1 : R/buildapcmonitors - Reddit
-
Compare LG C1 Vs Gigabyte FV43U | B&H Photo
-
Compare Gigabyte FV43U Vs Samsung CRG9 Vs LG C1 | B&H Photo
-
Compare Gigabyte AORUS FV43U Vs LG OLED48C1PUB - DisplayDB
-
[Newegg] AORUS FV43U 43" QLED Monitor - 4k 144hz - 900.00
-
What Do You Think Of AORUS FV43U Monitor? - Linus Tech Tips
-
[SOLVED] - Best 4K 144Hz Gaming Monitor. | Tom's Hardware Forum
-
Help Me Decide What Tv To Get As Monator? - PC - GameFAQs
-
QD-OLED AW3423DW Vs Aorus FV43U Monitors QD ... - YouTube
-
LG C1 OLED 48" Reviews, Pros And Cons | TechSpot
-
Best 4K Gaming Monitors 2022 - IGN
-
AORUS FV43U 43" 144Hz 2160p HBR3, NVIDIA G-SYNC ...
-
Best HDMI 2.1 Monitor July 2022: Latest News And Top Picks - WePC
ASUS XG259CMS*
LG 32G600A*
Sansui ES-G25F6Q Pro*
Samsung S40FG75 G75F*
Gigabyte M27UP*
Samsung S37FG75 G75F*
Innocn 25M2S*
KTC M27P6*
Acer XV275U F3*
LG OLED42C5*
MSI MAG 272QPW QD-OLED X28*
MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50*
MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED X24*
ASUS XG32UCWMG*
KTC M32P10*
Acer X34 X0*
LG 45GX900A*