C-223/15: No EU-wide Confusion, No EU-wide Injunction - The IPKat
3 comments:
AnonymousMonday, 3 October 2016 at 10:36:00 GMT+1And what happens to free circulation of "Combit" goods sold in the U.K.?
ReplyDeleteReplies- Reply
AnonymousMonday, 3 October 2016 at 11:55:00 GMT+1You can't. Free movement only affects goods YOU put on the market. It doesnt mean that if you don't infringe in one country of the EU you can elsewhere.Hope that helps.
ReplyDeleteReplies- Reply
Mark SchweizerMonday, 3 October 2016 at 13:42:00 GMT+1to anonymous at 10:36:00 BST: The question highlights why the answer to the referred question is not as obvious as the CJEU makes it sound. The unitary effect of the EU trade mark serves to prevent trade mark rights from interfering with the free trade of goods within the EU. Once you have territorially limited injunctions, you introduce such barriers. That's a necessary effect of such limited injunctions (note that technically, a third party selling COMMIT software from the UK to Germany is not in violation of the injunction, as it only applies to Commit as the party of the proceeding; however, a German court would have no trouble also enjoining the third party upon Combit's request).
ReplyDeleteReplies- Reply
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
Từ khóa » C-223/15
-
C-223/15 - CURIA - List Of Results
-
Judgment - CURIA - Documents - European Union
-
General Law - Part III, Title II, Chapter 223, Section 15
-
Reconciliation Of Trade Marks' Function With Prohibition Orders In ...
-
C-223/15 - Combit Software, Preliminary Ruling Oberlandesgericht ...
-
ECJ Rules On Scope Of Order Where Likelihood Of Confusion With EU ...
-
Court Of Justice 22 September 2016, In Case C‑223/15 - FTCC
-
References To The Court Of Justice Of The European Union: 2015
-
Sprawa C-223/15: Combit Software GmbH V. Commit Business ... - Lex
-
Rechtsprechung EuGH, 22.09.2016 - C-223/15
-
C-223/15 Combit Software | Expertisecentrum Europees Recht
-
Combit Software, C-223/15 By Margherita Bergamaschi - Prezi
-
Erroneous Venue; Procedure, Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 223 § 15 - Casetext
Anonymous
Mark Schweizer