Chunking | The Glossary Of Human Computer Interaction

• UX Courses
• Master Classes
• Community
• Literature
• Blog
• Search

• Log in
• Join our community Join us

Open menu Close menu Search Join us 3 months free — Gift of Love Offer Best offer this year: 3 months free + 5 Master Classes — Gift of Love

• UX Courses
• Master Classes
• Community
• Literature
• Blog
• Search

Log in

• Reviews / Why Join Our Community?
• For Companies
• FAQs
• Contact

1. Literature
2. The Glossary of Human Computer Interaction
3. Chapter 43

43. Chunking By Martin Harrod 503 shares Share this article Cite this article Cite this book chapter

The term chunking was introduced in a 1956 paper by George A. Miller, The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two : Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information. Chunking breaks up long strings of information into units or chunks. The resulting chunks are easier to commit to working memory than a longer and uninterrupted string of information. Chunking appears to work across all mediums including but not limited to: text, sounds, pictures, and videos. Perhaps the simplest example of chunking is a phone number as displayed in Figure 1.

16047559385	Without chunking, the number is hard to remember.
1 604 755 9385	The breaking down of the number into more “logical” chunks makes the number easier to remember.
1 (604) 755-9385	The addition of deliminators can also make the chunking process even more effective.

Figure 1.

In his original paper, Miller proposed that the maximum number of items (one number in a phone number would be an item) that should be chunked is 7 +/- 2. In other words, chunking enhances working memory most effectively when a string of information is broken into chunks of five to nine items.

More recently, Miller’s contemporaries such as Broadbent (1975) have suggested that the working memory capacity is actually 4-6 items and others like LeCompte (1999) have argued for as few as three. In practice, a range of three to six bits (4+/-1) appears ideal for interaction design. To validate this practice, consider Figure 2 which examines different size chunks in the context of an Operating System License Key (this is a random number and not an actual key).

B17JQX84MEHP3JCXQV74QLVBE	An example of chunking that is > 7 +/- 1
B17JQX84MEHP3JC XQV74QLVBE	An example of chunking that is = 7 +/- 1
B17JQ X84ME HP3JC XQV74 QLVBE	An example of chunking that is = 4+/- 1

Figure 2.

For most people, the last example would best facilitate a quick glance at one chunk of information, placement of the chunk in working memory, and the data entry of the chunk into the license key field. The end user could then repeat this process for the remaining four chunks.

43.1 for Interaction Design

The primary purpose of chunking is the enhancement of working memory. Chunking, therefore, should not be used when the information must be searched, scanned, or analyzed. Search engine results are an example of information that does not need to be memorized and therefore should not be chunked. If one where to constrain the number of results per page to five (4+/-1); then the end user could actually spend more time moving back and forth between pages (searching), comparing the various definitions (scanning), and deciding on the most appropriate definition (analyzing).

In short, Chunking should not be used as an argument for improved simplicity, legibility, or uncluttered page design. Many novice interaction practitioners unwittingly apply chunking in this manner (Bailey 2000) when they:

• Constrain the number of items on a menu bar to five or six.
• Place only five or six items in a pull down menu.
• Apply “The rule of six” to power point presentation or bulleted lists.
• Never have more than five or six radio buttons or check boxes together.

None of the above examples are a valid use of chunking and arguably such misapplication of the chunking principle has led some to dismiss chunking as little more than a “superstition” (Bailey 2000) or an “Urban legend” (Jones 2002). This is not to say that the above constraint should not be applied for other design reasons, rather that “the limits on our capacity for processing information” as described by Miller and others are not a proper justification in this context

43.2 for Interaction deign

Chunking is ideal when specific information must be memorized for later use. E-learning applications should make liberal use of chunking to aid in end-user memorization. Chunking is also ideal in environments where an interface must compete against other stimuli for the attention or working memory of the end user (car navigation systems, cell phone, public kiosks). Consider a health practitioner in an emergency room scenario. They are often:

1. Barraged by a multitude of visual and auditory stimuli such as telephones ringing, people talking, and rapid movement.
2. May have only moments to look at an interface to extract and memorize the important information.
3. May need to enter this information into disparate systems without the benefit of referring back to the source.
4. Use legacy systems that cannot be reprogrammed to repopulate or carry over data from one screen to the next
5. Are not allowed to write down information due to privacy legislation.

In the above environment, effective use of chunking can improve the usability and effectiveness of an information system. In Figure 3, the left hand column (Column A) does not use chunking while the right hand column (Column B) does. Of the two scenarios, Column B makes it much easier and faster for a health practitioner to focus on and memorize the Patient ID, especially when faced with the sensory overload of an emergency room.

Column A - Without Chunking	Column B - With Chunking
Patient ID:678290234 Name: Joe Smith DOB:02111973	Patient ID 6782 9023 4 Name: Joe Smith DOB 02 / 11 / 1973

Figure 3.

43.3 Summary

Chunking, when applied in its proper context, is a subtle but powerful design principle that can help improve the overall usefulness of systems. The primary goal of chunking is to help in situations where the commitment of information to working memory is required. Chunking helps in this process by breaking long strings of information into bit size chunks that are easier to remember, especially when the memory is faced with competing stimuli.

Chapter TOC

• 43 Chunking
• 43.1 for Interaction Design
• 43.2 for Interaction deign
• 43.3 Summary

Human-Computer Interaction: The Foundations of UX Design

Human-Computer Interaction: The Foundations of UX Design Closes in 1 days 11 hrs 24 mins 06 secs booked View Course

Get Weekly Design Insights

Join 327,164 designers who get useful UX / UI Design tips from our newsletter. Name A valid email address is required. Go 503 shares Share this article Cite this article Previous chapter Next chapter

Open Access—Link to us!

We believe in Open Access and the democratization of knowledge. Unfortunately, world-class educational materials such as this page are normally hidden behind paywalls or in expensive textbooks.

If you want this to change, cite this book chapter, link to us, or join us to help us democratize design knowledge!

Search

Close

Popular related searches

Filters

Search Results

Open Privacy Settings Close By using this site, you accept our Cookie Policy and Terms of Use. Customize

Our digital services use necessary tracking technologies, including third-party cookies, for security, functionality, and to uphold user rights. Optional cookies offer enhanced features, and analytics.

Essential

Experience the full potential of our site that remembers your preferences and supports secure sign-in.

Security

Governs the storage of data necessary for maintaining website security, user authentication, and fraud prevention mechanisms.

Enhanced Functionality

Saves your settings and preferences, like your location, for a more personalized experience.

Referral Program

We use cookies to enable our referral program, giving you and your friends discounts.

Error Reporting

We share user ID with Bugsnag and NewRelic to help us track errors and fix issues.

Analytics

Optimize your experience by allowing us to monitor site usage. You'll enjoy a smoother, more personalized journey without compromising your privacy.

Analytics Storage

Collects anonymous data on how you navigate and interact, helping us make informed improvements.

Google

Differentiates real visitors from automated bots, ensuring accurate usage data and improving your website experience.

Personalization

Lets us tailor your digital ads to match your interests, making them more relevant and useful to you.

Advertising Storage

Stores information for better-targeted advertising, enhancing your online ad experience.

Personalization Storage

Permits storing data to personalize content and ads across Google services based on user behavior, enhancing overall user experience.

Advertising Personalization

Allows for content and ad personalization across Google services based on user behavior. This consent enhances user experiences.

User Data

Enables personalizing ads based on user data and interactions, allowing for more relevant advertising experiences across Google services.

Advertising

Receive more relevant advertisements by sharing your interests and behavior with our trusted advertising partners.

Meta Pixel

Enables better ad targeting and measurement on Meta platforms, making ads you see more relevant.

Meta CAPI

Allows for improved ad effectiveness and measurement through Meta's Conversions API, ensuring privacy-compliant data sharing.

LinkedIn Insights

Tracks conversions, retargeting, and web analytics for LinkedIn ad campaigns, enhancing ad relevance and performance.

LinkedIn CAPI

Enhances LinkedIn advertising through server-side event tracking, offering more accurate measurement and personalization.

Google Ads Tag

Tracks ad performance and user engagement, helping deliver ads that are most useful to you.

Accept all Save Settings

Share Knowledge, Get Respect!

Share on:

or copy link

Copy link

Cite according to academic standards

Simply copy and paste the text below into your bibliographic reference list, onto your blog, or anywhere else. You can also just hyperlink to this book chapter.

Citation format APA (recommended) MLA IEEE ACM What is this? Copy citation Harrod, M. (2015, July 5). Chunking. IxDF - Interaction Design Foundation. Harrod, Martin. “Chunking” IxDF - Interaction Design Foundation. 17 Dec. 2025 M. Harrod. “Chunking” IxDF - Interaction Design Foundation. (accessed Dec. 17, 2025). Martin Harrod. 2015. Chunking Retrieved December 17, 2025 from Cite selection Copied to clipboard!

New to UX Design? We're Giving You a Free eBook!

Download our free ebook “The Basics of User Experience Design” to learn about core concepts of UX design.

In 9 chapters, we'll cover: conducting user interviews, design thinking, interaction design, mobile UX design, usability, UX research, and many more!

Name Download free ebook Go A valid email address is required. Get free UX design learning material every week 327,164 designers enjoy our newsletter—sure you don't want to receive it?

Download Premium UX Design Literature

Enjoy unlimited downloads of our literature. Our online textbooks are written by 100+ leading designers, bestselling authors and Ivy League professors.

Bringing Numbers to Life The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction Gamification at Work: Designing Engaging Business Software The Social Design of Technical Systems: Building Technologies for Communities