Comparison Of Two Intervertebral Disc Failure Models In A ... - PubMed

Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Skip to main page content

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation Search: Search Advanced Clipboard Save Email Send to

• Clipboard
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Display options Display options Format Abstract PubMed PMID

Save citation to file

Format: Summary (text) PubMed PMID Abstract (text) CSV Create file Cancel

Email citation

Email address has not been verified. Go to My NCBI account settings to confirm your email and then refresh this page. To: Subject: Body: Format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) MeSH and other data Send email Cancel

Add to Collections

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Please try again Add Cancel

Add to My Bibliography

• My Bibliography

Unable to load your delegates due to an error Please try again Add Cancel

Your saved search

Name of saved search: Search terms: Test search terms Would you like email updates of new search results? Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons

• Yes
• No

Email: (change) Frequency: Monthly Weekly Daily Which day? The first Sunday The first Monday The first Tuesday The first Wednesday The first Thursday The first Friday The first Saturday The first day The first weekday Which day? Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Report format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) PubMed Send at most: 1 item 5 items 10 items 20 items 50 items 100 items 200 items Send even when there aren't any new results Optional text in email: Save Cancel

Create a file for external citation management software

Create file Cancel

Your RSS Feed

Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: 5 10 15 20 50 100 Create RSS Cancel RSS Link Copy

Actions

CiteCollectionsAdd to Collections

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an errorPlease try again Add Cancel PermalinkPermalinkCopyDisplay options Display options Format AbstractPubMedPMID

Page navigation

• Title & authors
• Abstract
• Publication types
• MeSH terms
• LinkOut - more resources

Title & authors Abstract Publication types MeSH terms LinkOut - more resources CiteDisplay options Display options Format AbstractPubMedPMID

Abstract

The intervertebral disc (IVD) is essential for the mobility and stability of the spine. During flexion-distraction injuries, which are frequent at the cervical spine level, the IVD is often disrupted. Finite element studies have been done to investigate injury mechanisms and patterns at the cervical spine. However, they rarely include IVD failure model. The aim of this paper was to implement and compare two types of IVD failure models and their impact on hyperflexion and hyperflexion-compression injuries simulations. The failure models were tested on a detailed C4-C5 finite elements model. The first failure model consisted in a maximal strain model applied to the elements of the annulus and nucleus. The second failure model consisted in the implementation of a rupture plane in the middle of the IVD with a tied interface created between the two sections. This interface is defined by threshold stress values of detachment in traction and shearing. The two failure models were tested in flexion only and in flexion-compression. The model without inclusion of an IVD failure model was also tested. Loads at failure and injury patterns were reported. Both failure models produce failure loads that were consistent with experimental data. Injury patterns observed were in agreement with experimental and numerical studies. However, in flexion-compression, the rupture plane model simulation reached important energy error due to high deformations in the IVD elements. Also, without inclusion of an IVD failure model, energy error forced the end of the simulation in flexion-compression. Therefore, inclusion of IVD failure model is important since it leads to realistic results, but the maximal strain failure model is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

• Comparative Study Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search

MeSH terms

• Biomechanical Phenomena Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Cervical Vertebrae / injuries* Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Finite Element Analysis Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Humans Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Intervertebral Disc / injuries* Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Models, Biological* Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Pressure Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Rupture Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Traction Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search

LinkOut - more resources

• Medical

  • MedlinePlus Health Information

• Miscellaneous

  • NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

[x] Cite Copy Download .nbib .nbib Format: AMA APA MLA NLM Send To

• Clipboard
• Email
• Save
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation Manager

[x]

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.