- Home
- Processors
- Videocards
- Home
- / Processors
- / Compare processors
- / Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 
vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 vs 0.748
| Specifications (specs) |
| Launch date | August 2008 vs July 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 vs 0.748 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.522 vs 0.501
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.255 vs 16.702
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 vs 0.111
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.829 vs 3.688
| Specifications (specs) |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 4096 KB |
| Benchmarks |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 vs 0.501 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.255 vs 16.702 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 vs 0.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.829 vs 3.688 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | | |
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 994 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1775 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 | 0.522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 | 24.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 | 0.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 | 3.829 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) |
Essentials |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Kentsfield |
| Launch date | August 2008 | July 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3118 | 3296 |
| Price now | $22.99 |
| Processor Number | Q8200 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 36.05 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
| 64 bit support |
| Base frequency | 2.33 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | 2x 143 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 8192 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 62 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 456 million | 582 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
| Low Halogen Options Available |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | 775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) |
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
Advanced Technologies |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |
| FSB parity |
| Idle States |
| Intel 64 |
| Intel® AES New Instructions |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology |
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology |
| Thermal Monitoring |
Virtualization |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
Navigation
Differences Compare benchmarks Compare specifications (specs)
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare
Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 with others
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs IntelPentium D 940 IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs 
AMDSempron 2800+ IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs AMDSempron 3800+ IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs IntelPentium Dual-Core E2140 IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs AMDAthlon X2 BE-2400 IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs IntelCore 2 Quad Q9400 About
AskGeek.io - Compare processors and videocards to choose the best.
Sections
Links
Language
English
Deutsch
Française
Español
Português
Русский © 2024, AskGeek.io